---
slug: oip-disconfirming-edge-1
title: Disconfirming Edge 1: Selection vs Teleology
canonical: https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-1
---

**C09** (Selection) contradicts **C25** (Teleology)

**Tension:** Does natural selection exhaust apparent purpose, or is there a residue of directedness that selection cannot account for?

**Resolution status:** UNRESOLVED

**What would settle it:** Demonstration of (a) an evolutionary trend that is not random walk, not local fitness gradient, and not thermodynamic dissipation — requiring a new causal category; OR (b) complete derivation of all apparent purpose from selection + dissipation, rendering teleology redundant.

**Current state:** C09 (T1 biology) has overwhelming empirical support. C25 (T3/T4) has no accepted physical mechanism. The burden of proof is entirely on C25. The fault line is clear: mechanism vs. interpretation.

**Honest assessment:** The tension is asymmetrical. Selection is operational; teleology is load-optional. They coexist in the graph only because the question (“why does nature appear purposive?”) has not been fully dissolved.

---

## Corpus map
- C09 (Selection): [C09 in the Encyclopedia](/a/convergence-encyclopedia-c09) · [C09 in the Catalogue](/a/oip-node-c09-selection-variation-retention-universal-darwinism)
- C25 (Teleology): [C25 in the Encyclopedia](/a/convergence-encyclopedia-c25) · [C25 in the Catalogue](/a/oip-node-c25-teleology-entelechy)
- Disconfirming edges: [1](/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-1) · [2](/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-2) · [3](/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-3) · [4](/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-4) · [5](/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-5)
- Catalogue hub: [Convergence Catalogue — Public Article](/a/oip-convergence-public-article) · [The Schema](/a/oip-convergence-schema)
