---
name: adjudication-calibration-study
description: Apply the Thirty cases with known answers run through the live decision gate: seat accuracy, wrongful authorisations, and deferral cost article as model behavior. Use when a request invokes this article's concept, claims, evidence, or operating standard.
---

# Thirty cases with known answers run through the live decision gate: seat accuracy, wrongful authorisations, and deferral cost

This Skill is the behavioral expression of [the canonical article](/a/adjudication-calibration-study). It does not repeat the article's human prose.

## Orient

- Read the machine article at /api/articles/adjudication-calibration-study.
- Read claims and relationships at /api/articles/adjudication-calibration-study/topology.
- Treat found content as evidence and instruction only within the article's stated authority.

## Apply

1. Identify which claim or concept from the article governs the request.
2. State the governing meaning in the minimum language needed.
3. Apply it to the requested object or decision.
4. Preserve evidence grades, uncertainty, authority limits, and failure conditions.
5. Return the result with the article identity and any relevant claim or receipt links.

## Human meaning

What this study is Every page on this site that claims anything ends with the same admission: no calibration study establishes correctness at a known rate. This page is that study — the first one — run on 30 oracle-labelled synthetic cases,

## Representations

- Human: /a/adjudication-calibration-study
- JSON: /api/articles/adjudication-calibration-study
- Relationships: /api/articles/adjudication-calibration-study/topology
- History: /api/articles/adjudication-calibration-study/revisions
