---
name: auditable-reasoning-hardened
description: Apply the Two models reached the same verdict citing different clauses; the gate now compares the reasoning, not the answer article as model behavior. Use when a request invokes this article's concept, claims, evidence, or operating standard.
---

# Two models reached the same verdict citing different clauses; the gate now compares the reasoning, not the answer

This Skill is the behavioral expression of [the canonical article](/a/auditable-reasoning-hardened). It does not repeat the article's human prose.

## Orient

- Read the machine article at /api/articles/auditable-reasoning-hardened.
- Read claims and relationships at /api/articles/auditable-reasoning-hardened/topology.
- Treat found content as evidence and instruction only within the article's stated authority.

## Apply

1. Identify which claim or concept from the article governs the request.
2. State the governing meaning in the minimum language needed.
3. Apply it to the requested object or decision.
4. Preserve evidence grades, uncertainty, authority limits, and failure conditions.
5. Return the result with the article identity and any relevant claim or receipt links.

## Human meaning

The defect the last APPROVE was hiding The 72-call experiment https://miscsubjects.com/a/auditable-reasoning-audited ended on a celebrated result: the first sealed APPROVE, three models unanimous, clause signature 1,2,3 . It was false conve

## Representations

- Human: /a/auditable-reasoning-hardened
- JSON: /api/articles/auditable-reasoning-hardened
- Relationships: /api/articles/auditable-reasoning-hardened/topology
- History: /api/articles/auditable-reasoning-hardened/revisions
