---
name: continuous-controls-evidence-object
description: Apply the How to preserve the judgment behind an automated SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance check article as model behavior. Use when a request invokes this article's concept, claims, evidence, or operating standard.
---

# How to preserve the judgment behind an automated SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance check

This Skill is the behavioral expression of [the canonical article](/a/continuous-controls-evidence-object). It does not repeat the article's human prose.

## Orient

- Read the machine article at /api/articles/continuous-controls-evidence-object.
- Read claims and relationships at /api/articles/continuous-controls-evidence-object/topology.
- Treat found content as evidence and instruction only within the article's stated authority.

## Apply

1. Identify which claim or concept from the article governs the request.
2. State the governing meaning in the minimum language needed.
3. Apply it to the requested object or decision.
4. Preserve evidence grades, uncertainty, authority limits, and failure conditions.
5. Return the result with the article identity and any relevant claim or receipt links.

## Human meaning

The check became an API call. The judgement did not. Compliance automation earned its category by mechanising the boring half of a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 program. Where an auditor once emailed for screenshots, a platform now reads the cloud pro

## Representations

- Human: /a/continuous-controls-evidence-object
- JSON: /api/articles/continuous-controls-evidence-object
- Relationships: /api/articles/continuous-controls-evidence-object/topology
- History: /api/articles/continuous-controls-evidence-object/revisions
