---
name: school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati
description: Apply the Critiques of Implicate Order Testability and Formalization article as model behavior. Use when a request invokes this article's concept, claims, evidence, or operating standard.
---

# Critiques of Implicate Order Testability and Formalization

This Skill is the behavioral expression of [the canonical article](/a/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati). It does not repeat the article's human prose.

## Orient

- Read the machine article at /api/articles/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati.
- Read claims and relationships at /api/articles/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati/topology.
- Treat found content as evidence and instruction only within the article's stated authority.

## Apply

1. Identify which claim or concept from the article governs the request.
2. State the governing meaning in the minimum language needed.
3. Apply it to the requested object or decision.
4. Preserve evidence grades, uncertainty, authority limits, and failure conditions.
5. Return the result with the article identity and any relevant claim or receipt links.

## Human meaning

Core Results of the School The school collects objections that David Bohm's implicate order lacks empirical testability and mathematical formalization inside standard physics. These objections supply a disconfirming edge to claims that flow

## Representations

- Human: /a/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati
- JSON: /api/articles/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati
- Relationships: /api/articles/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati/topology
- History: /api/articles/school-critiques-of-implicate-order-testability-and-formalizati/revisions
