---
slug: convergence-encyclopedia-c24
title: Convergence Encyclopedia: C24 — Observer / Fine-Tuning
canonical: https://miscsubjects.com/a/convergence-encyclopedia-c24
---

**F1 — Tier.** T3 (interpretation — not empirically decidable; framed as observation-selection effect). CRITICAL NOTE: This node stays load-optional throughout. It maps boundary terrain but carries no structural load in the convergence claim.

**F2 — Sources.** 
- Carter, B. (1974). “Large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology.” In Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data (M.S. Longair, ed.), 291–298. D. Reidel.
- Barrow, J.D. & Tipler, F.J. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford University Press.
- Rees, M.J. (1999). Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe. Basic Books.
- Wheeler, J.A. (1977). “Genesis and observership.” In Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences (Butts & Hintikka, eds.), 3–33. Reidel. (Participatory universe — T3.)

**F3 — Domains.** Cosmology (fundamental constants), philosophy of science (observation selection effects), theoretical physics (multiverse — T3).

**F4 — Scale.** Cosmic — fundamental constants apply across the observable universe (~10²⁶ m).

**F5 — Falsifier.** Hard — the fine-tuning claim is observationally grounded (we observe the constants), and the “explanation” (selection effect) is meta-empirical. A direct falsifier would require observing a universe with different constants — currently impossible. This is why C24 stays T3. The honest position: no falsifier, no science, no load.

**F6 — Rival (strongest form).** The anthropic principle is a selection effect, not an explanation. We observe constants compatible with life because if they weren’t, we wouldn’t be here to observe them. This is trivially true and predicts nothing. The “fine-tuning” is an artifact of our ignorance — we don’t know why the constants have the values they do, so we invent a principle that makes our ignorance look profound. (Gould 1989 Wonderful Life on contingency; Smolin 1997 The Life of the Cosmos on cosmological natural selection as alternative.)

**F7 — Independence.** HIGH. Carter (cosmology, Cambridge, 1974), Barrow & Tipler (cosmology/physics, Sussex, 1986), Rees (astrophysics, Cambridge, 1999), Wheeler (physics, Princeton, 1977) — independent formulations of observer-dependence in cosmology. The shared context (big bang cosmology) is a common background, not a shared research program.

**F8 — Pattern type.** Metaphysical.

**F9 — Maps.** A2’s carried node (compressibility-fine-tuning tension); A8 (observer-structure).
EDGE (in-tension-with): C24 is IN-TENSION-WITH C06. The tension: C06 (compressibility) claims the world is highly compressible — describable by a small amount of math. C24 (fine-tuning) asks why this particular compressible description applies. We only call compressible regularities “laws” because they are compressible; the fine-tuning question is whether the compressibility itself requires explanation. The two nodes point in opposite directions: C06 celebrates the convergence; C24 questions whether the convergence is a selection effect. Both carry load in opposite directions. This edge is explicitly typed; the tension is unresolved.

---

## Corpus map
- Previous: [Convergence Encyclopedia: C23](/a/convergence-encyclopedia-c23)
- Next: [Convergence Encyclopedia: C25](/a/convergence-encyclopedia-c25)
- Encyclopedia start: [The Schema](/a/convergence-encyclopedia-schema)
- Same node, other planes: [Catalogue node C24](/a/oip-node-c24-the-observer-fine-tuning) · [Catalogue hub](/a/oip-convergence-public-article)
- Edges touching C24: [disconfirming edge 4](/a/oip-disconfirming-edge-4)
- Kin corpora: [Total Structure](/a/oip-total-structure) · [Signature of the Grain](/a/oip-sog-preamble-axioms)
