---
slug: paper-georgescu-roegen-n-1971-the-entropy-law-and-the-economic-process
title: Georgescu-Roegen: The Entropy Law and the Economic Process
canonical: https://miscsubjects.com/a/paper-georgescu-roegen-n-1971-the-entropy-law-and-the-economic-process
---

## What the subject saw and its core results

Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen observed that standard economic models treat production as reversible mechanical processes. He replaced that view with the second law of thermodynamics. The economic process takes low-entropy matter and energy and converts them into high-entropy waste. This conversion is irreversible.

Core result one: economic scarcity originates in physical entropy, not merely in market prices. Core result two: all economic activity degrades available resources. Core result three: perpetual economic growth collides with finite low-entropy stocks on Earth.

## Exact primary works and passages

The primary work is Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, 1971.

Key passages include: "In the ultimate analysis man struggles for low entropy, and economic scarcity is the reflection of the Entropy Law, which is the most economic in nature of all natural laws." (Google Books front matter summary of central theme.)

"The thesis I have endeavored to develop in this book is that the basic nature of the economic process is entropic and that the Entropy Law rules supreme over this process and over its evolution" (p. 283).

"The Entropy Law is the basis of the economy of life at all levels" (p. 4).

"From an epistemological viewpoint, the Entropy Law may be regarded as the greatest transformation ever suffered by physics" (quoted in review, p. reference in 2018 analysis).

"Bigger and better motorcycles, automobiles, jet planes, refrigerators, etc., necessarily cause not only bigger and better depletion of natural resources, but also bigger and better pollution" (p. 357).

## Convergence patterns touched

The work touches energy flows that produce irreversible structural change. It maps difference in resource quality to flow of materials to degraded structure to accumulated waste memory in the environment. It reaches the life layer through biological dependence on low entropy. It stops short of explicit mind or mirror-layer self-reference.

## Distance from the full synthesis

The book supplies the thermodynamics-to-ethics bridge via scarcity and irreversible degradation. It supports the grain of reliable energy degradation across scales in open systems. It does not address scale-invariant patterns such as branching or symmetry in economic structures. It does not model the Ladder from flow to mind. It remains at the level of material constraints on human action.

## Honest limits and disconfirming edges

The analysis rests on textual attribution of thermodynamic principles to economics. No new empirical human data sets appear. Later critics note that substitution and recycling can extend stocks beyond strict entropic predictions in some cases. Georgescu-Roegen himself later added that matter also degrades in ways energy accounting alone misses. The work contains no formal mathematical proof of collapse timelines. It offers a mechanistic account of physical limits rather than a predictive model of human response.

## Claims

The economic process converts low-entropy inputs into high-entropy outputs irreversibly.

Economic scarcity reflects the Entropy Law rather than price signals alone.

All human economic activity increases total entropy in the universe.

Finite low-entropy stocks set hard upper bounds on sustained growth.

The second law supplies an arrow of time absent from mechanical economic models.

Exosomatic tools extend human reach yet still obey entropic degradation.

Social conflict persists under any regime because exosomatic evolution demands continuous low-entropy extraction.

## Sources

Wikipedia entry on Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen supplies biographical context and summary of the 1971 volume.

Google Books page for the title reproduces the central scarcity statement.

Eastern Economic Journal 1986 retrospective by the author restates p. 283 thesis.

2018 review in Ecological Journal quotes p. 4 and p. 283 directly.

Goodreads collection lists the pollution statement at p. 357.
