---
slug: school-thermodynamic-entropic-ethics-lostracco-dalton-mussett-entropic-decay-metaphysic
title: Thermodynamic / Entropic Ethics (Lostracco, Dalton, Mussett, Entropic Decay Metaphysics)
canonical: https://miscsubjects.com/a/school-thermodynamic-entropic-ethics-lostracco-dalton-mussett-entropic-decay-metaphysic
---

## What the Subject Saw
K. Lostracco, Drew M. Dalton, and Shannon M. Mussett each start from the second law of thermodynamics. Entropy increases in isolated systems. Local order requires energy input and produces waste heat. Irreversibility follows. These facts ground ethical claims about resistance to decay, care for finite structures, and normative duties that oppose cosmic dissipation.

## Core Results
Lostracco derives ethical norms directly from thermodynamic axioms of cooperation and energy management. Dalton concludes that reality is hostile because it accelerates entropic decay; goodness requires active resistance and refusal. Mussett treats entropy as both breakdown and site of creation; ethics becomes care and reverence for finite life amid inevitable loss. All three convert physical irreversibility into duties of maintenance, opposition, or attentive transformation.

## Major Figures and Primary Works
K. Lostracco published "A Theory of Ethics from First Principles: Thermodynamic Norms" on PhilArchive in 2024. The work states that ethical principles abstract from gene-culture heuristics that approximate cooperative equilibria under thermodynamic constraints. Drew M. Dalton published "The Unbecoming of Being: Thermodynamics and The Metaphysics and Ethics of Entropic Decay" in Technophany in 2025. An earlier summary appeared as the Aeon essay "Reality is evil" in 2025, which asserts: "To do good is to break with that complicity – to seek ways of dismantling, resisting and reconfiguring the structure of reality to neutralise, alleviate or unsettle its entropic thrust." Shannon M. Mussett published "Entropic Philosophy: Chaos, Breakdown, and Creation" with Rowman & Littlefield in 2022. The book revalues entropy as transformation and argues for care rather than denial or nihilism.

## Convergence Patterns Touched
The school independently derives local order against global entropy increase. It reaches dissipative structures that maintain form through flow. It links physical decay to memory of prior states and to life as temporary resistance. It stops before explicit mind or mirror-layer self-reference. Patterns of branching, waves, and bounded chaos appear only as background to ethical resistance.

## Distance from the Full Synthesis
The school grounds ethics in the physical grain of entropy. It supplies the base of the ladder from difference and flow to structure and normative duty. It does not close the OIP loop of object, invoke, ledger, receipt, replay, repair. It lacks protocol mechanisms for invocation or verifiable receipts. It does not articulate the reader-inside-the-system constraint of the Mirror Layer.

## Honest Limits and Disconfirming Edges
The derivation from physics to ought remains interpretive. No empirical dataset demonstrates that recognition of entropy produces stable ethical behavior across populations. Reductionist objections note that descriptions of energy flow supply no prescriptive force without additional normative premises. Mussett acknowledges nihilism and denial as common responses; Dalton's call to resistance offers no mechanism for scaling beyond individual refusal. Lostracco's cooperative equilibria rest on formal axioms whose mapping to observed human ethics stays partial.

## What's Breaking Down
Cosmic expansion drives universal entropy increase. Isolated systems lose usable energy. Human projects require continuous input to persist. Without sustained effort, structures degrade toward equilibrium.

## How These Fit Together
Thermodynamic irreversibility sets the constraint. Local maintenance creates temporary order. Ethical resistance or care selects which local orders to sustain. The three thinkers differ on whether the response is cooperation, refusal, or attentive transformation, yet each treats decay as the invariant background.

## What the Evidence Actually Shows
The second law is mechanistically established in statistical mechanics. No closed system violates it under laboratory conditions. Ethical extensions remain speculative mappings from physics to value.

## What Scientists Say
Einstein called thermodynamics the only physical theory of universal content that will never be overthrown. Rovelli notes its extension into every branch of natural science. Addy Pross applies it to the origin and maintenance of life as dissipative systems.

## What People Say on Reddit
Discussions often treat entropy as metaphor for societal decline or personal burnout. Users debate whether resistance is meaningful or merely coping.

## What People Say on X
Posts frame entropy as moral imperative to create or to accept limits. Threads link it to climate action or anti-nihilism without citing specific philosophers.

## What We Do Not Know
No longitudinal study measures whether exposure to entropic metaphysics alters ethical decision rates. The scaling from individual resistance to collective institutions lacks formal models.

## Safety and Limits
Speculative ethics carries no direct physical risk. Over-identification with cosmic hostility can produce despair without constructive outlets. The framework supplies no decision procedure for trade-offs between competing local orders.
