---
slug: paper-noether-e-1918-invariante-variationsprobleme
title: Noether (1918): Invariante Variationsprobleme
canonical: https://miscsubjects.com/a/paper-noether-e-1918-invariante-variationsprobleme
---

## What Noether Saw and Its Core Results

Emmy Noether examined variational problems that admit continuous groups in the Lie sense. The integral I remains invariant under such a group. This invariance produces conservation laws or identities among the Lagrangian expressions.

The work establishes two theorems. Theorem I links finite continuous symmetries to divergences that become conservation laws. Theorem II links infinite groups depending on arbitrary functions to differential identities.

Energy, momentum, and angular momentum arise as conserved quantities precisely when the action is invariant under translations and rotations. The theorems apply to any system whose equations derive from a variational principle.

## Exact Primary Works and Passages

The primary source is Emmy Noether, "Invariante Variationsprobleme," Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse (1918): 235–257.

An English translation appears as E. Noether, "Invariant Variation Problems," translated by M. A. Tavel, Transport Theory and Statistical Physics 1, no. 3 (1971): 183–207. Another translation is available at arXiv:physics/0503066.

Key passage from the English translation of Theorem I: "If the integral I is invariant under a [group] G_ρ, then there are ρ linearly independent combinations among the Lagrangian expressions which become divergences – and conversely, that implies the invariance of I under a [group] G_ρ. The theorem remains valid in the limiting case of an infinite number of parameters."

Key passage from Theorem II: "If the integral I is invariant under a [group] G_∞_ρ depending upon arbitrary functions and their derivatives up to order σ, then there are ρ identities among the Lagrangian expressions and their derivatives up to order σ. Here as well the converse is valid."

These statements appear in the section that formulates the theorems before the proofs in subsequent paragraphs.

## Convergence Patterns Evidenced

Noether's theorems establish symmetry as a direct structural pattern produced by the variational structure of energy flows. Continuous symmetries generate conserved quantities that constrain the possible forms of solutions. This matches the GRAIN claim that energy flows reliably produce symmetry and flow networks.

The theorems supply the mechanistic bridge from flow (action integral) to structure (conserved currents) to memory (persistent invariants across time). They operate at the physics layer of the Ladder.

The work shows that the observer's choice of coordinates or reference frame interacts with the invariance properties, placing the reader inside the system in a limited sense through coordinate transformations.

## Distance from the Full OIP/GRAIN Synthesis

Noether supplies a precise mathematical mechanism for one convergence pattern: symmetry arising from energy-flow invariance. The theorems stop at the differential equations and their integrals. They do not address branching, spirals, waves, bounded chaos, scale invariance, or the transition from memory to life to mind.

The Mirror Layer receives no treatment. The paper remains within classical variational calculus and does not extend to information, replication, or self-reference.

## Honest Limits and Disconfirming Edges

The theorems require the existence of a variational principle and continuous (Lie) groups. Systems without an action principle or with only discrete symmetries fall outside the stated results.

Reductionist objections note that the theorems describe formal consequences of invariance rather than explain why particular symmetries appear in nature. The paper itself offers no dynamical account of symmetry selection.

Quantum extensions and Noether's second theorem applications in gauge theories lie beyond the 1918 text. The original work contains no empirical data and remains a formal proof.

## Claims

- Claim c1: Noether's Theorem I states that invariance of the action under a finite continuous group implies ρ independent divergence relations among the Euler-Lagrange expressions. Tier: mechanistic. Source: primary paper.
- Claim c2: Theorem II states that invariance under an infinite group depending on arbitrary functions yields differential identities of order σ. Tier: mechanistic. Source: primary paper.
- Claim c3: Conserved quantities such as energy and momentum correspond to translation and rotation symmetries of the action. Tier: mechanistic. Source: primary paper and standard physics application.
- Claim c4: The theorems apply only to systems whose dynamics derive from a variational principle. Tier: mechanistic. Source: primary paper.
- Claim c5: The 1918 text provides no account of how symmetries arise dynamically or extend to life or mind. Tier: mechanistic. Source: direct reading of scope.

## Sources

- s1: Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 235–257. Type: other. URL: http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de (original German). Quote: theorems formulated on pp. 235–257. Summary: Establishes the two theorems linking symmetries to conservation laws and identities.
- s2: Noether, E. (1971). Invariant Variation Problems (M. A. Tavel, Trans.). Transport Theory and Statistical Physics, 1(3), 183–207. Type: other. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0503066. Quote: "If the integral I is invariant under a [group] G_ρ, then there are ρ linearly independent combinations among the Lagrangian expressions which become divergences." Summary: English translation used for verifiable passages.
