---
slug: paper-massoudi-m-2016-a-possible-ethical-imperative-based-on-the-entropy-law
title: Massoudi (2016): A Possible Ethical Imperative Based on the Entropy Law
canonical: https://miscsubjects.com/a/paper-massoudi-m-2016-a-possible-ethical-imperative-based-on-the-entropy-law
---

## What the Work Establishes

Mehrdad Massoudi published the paper in the journal Entropy in 2016. The paper links ethics directly to the second law of thermodynamics. It builds on earlier ideas from R. Bruce Lindsay. Massoudi proposes that the entropy law creates an ethical demand for simplicity, conservation, and harmony in human actions.

The core result is an extension of Lindsay's Thermodynamic Imperative. Lindsay had suggested a principle similar to Kant's categorical imperative but grounded in entropy. Massoudi adds a second imperative focused on reducing unnecessary entropy production through ordered, minimal behavior.

## Exact Load-Bearing Passages

The abstract states: "This paper is an attempt to establish a connection between ethics and the second law of thermodynamics (entropy)." The introduction reviews Lindsay's 1959 article "Entropy consumption and values in physical science" from American Scientist. Massoudi writes that Lindsay proposed a Thermodynamic Imperative. The paper then extends this by suggesting "simplicity, conservation, and harmony" as ethical guides derived from entropy considerations.

These passages appear in the open-access version at mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/11/389. The conclusion ties human responsibility to minimizing entropy increase where possible, framing it as an imperative rather than optional preference.

## Relation to OIP/GRAIN Synthesis

The work supports the thermo-to-ethics bridge in the GRAIN synthesis. GRAIN holds that energy flows produce reliable structural patterns such as branching, symmetry, and flow networks. Massoudi treats the entropy law as a physical constraint that generates an ethical demand. This aligns with the Ladder concept running from difference and flow to structure, memory, life, and mind. Human choice enters at the level of memory and mind, where actions can either accelerate or slow local entropy production.

The synthesis places the reader inside the system via the Mirror Layer. Massoudi's imperative makes this explicit: ethical reflection must account for physical irreversibility. Actions that increase entropy unnecessarily violate the derived imperative.

## Convergence Patterns Evidenced

The paper touches entropy and negentropy patterns. It connects thermodynamic irreversibility to moral order. It evidences the flow-to-structure step in the Ladder. Conservation and simplicity map to bounded flow networks and reduced waste. Harmony reflects scale-invariant order across physical and ethical domains.

It also touches memory and life layers indirectly. Ethical systems persist as cultural memory that guides future actions toward lower entropy paths. The work stays within mechanistic and anecdotal tiers for its claims.

## Honest Limits and Disconfirming Edges

The paper offers no empirical data on whether following the proposed imperative produces measurable ethical or physical outcomes. Its arguments remain interpretive extensions of thermodynamics into ethics. A reductionist objection notes that entropy laws describe closed systems while human ethics operates in open, value-laden contexts. No falsifiable test distinguishes this imperative from other ethical frameworks. The synthesis lens views the work as a partial bridge rather than full endorsement. Massoudi does not address the full OIP loop of object, invoke, ledger, receipt, replay, and repair. The paper stops at proposing the imperative without mechanisms for invocation or verification.

Further reading appears in later citations that reference this 2016 work for similar thermo-ethics links, yet none supply controlled studies. The distance from full GRAIN remains the gap between thermodynamic description and protocol-level implementation.
