{"_self":{"principle":"Self-explaining payload — no external context required. This _self block describes what you are reading and where to look next.","widget":"article_voxels","feature":"voxels","name":"Voxel graph","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","contains":"claim voxels + source edges","slug":"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/voxels","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim"},"how_to_use":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim","imessage":null,"router_tag":null,"proof_chain":[{"step":1,"claim":"Articles are voxel graphs of tiered claims, not prose blobs.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/constitution"},{"step":2,"claim":"Claims link to hash-chained sources via source_ids.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/sources"},{"step":3,"claim":"Ask reads topology; ingest/claim append to ledger.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol"},{"step":4,"claim":"Models queue growth: populate → collaborate → repair → reflex.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/grow"},{"step":5,"claim":"Graph proves its own shape (reflex) and $/claim (yield).","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/graph.html?layer=reflex"},{"step":6,"claim":"Full feature index + _explain on every API response.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map"}],"related_features":[{"id":"constitution","name":"Article constitution","what":"Binding rules: required article slots, claim/source rules, ontology anti-sprawl.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/constitution","read_md":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/constitution?format=markdown"}},{"id":"sources_ledger","name":"Source ledger","what":"Hash-chained cited sources; verify integrity at GET .../sources.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/sources","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/sources"}},{"id":"claim_post","name":"Claim post protocol","what":"Prompt-injection style POST — one claim voxel with who_claims + posted_by.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/voxels","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim"}}],"system_map":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map","system_map_markdown":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map?format=markdown","not_medical_advice":true},"_explain":{"feature":"voxels","name":"Voxel graph","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","why":"Every feature is auditable collective intelligence","how":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","model":null,"verifies":null,"urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/voxels","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim"},"imessage":null,"router":null,"related":[{"id":"constitution","what":"Binding rules: required article slots, claim/source rules, ontology anti-sprawl."},{"id":"sources_ledger","what":"Hash-chained cited sources; verify integrity at GET .../sources."},{"id":"claim_post","what":"Prompt-injection style POST — one claim voxel with who_claims + posted_by."}],"not_medical_advice":true},"position":{"you_are_here":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence — LL144 requires an annual bias audit of automated hiring tools. It says nothing about the 364 days of decisions in between. Here is the record layer for those.","plane":"nyc","master_entry":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/philosophy","siblings":[],"machine_side":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/voxels","discourse":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/discourse","append_protocol":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/append-protocol","protocol_door":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol"},"slug":"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence","div_mode":false,"voxel":null,"divs":[],"voxels":[{"id":"c1","div_id":"claim:c1","kind":"claim","text":"NYC Local Law 144 requires that an automated employment decision tool used to screen NYC candidates or employees have a bias audit by an independent auditor within one year before use, with a summary of results — selection rates and impact ratios by sex and race/ethnicity categories — published, candidate notice at least ten business days before use, enforcement by DCWP, and civil penalties of $500 for a first violation and $500 to $1,500 for each subsequent one, each day of use counting separately.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"The obligation","status":"active","source_ids":[],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[],"why_material":"The live legal obligation this page addresses, stated with its actual mechanics.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c1","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c1"},{"id":"c2","div_id":"claim:c2","kind":"claim","text":"An LL144 bias audit is point-in-time and aggregate: it establishes group-level impact ratios for a past period and says nothing about any individual decision the tool makes between audits.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"The gap","status":"active","source_ids":[],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[],"why_material":"The gap between what the statute produces and what a complainant, auditor, or respondent needs is the whole subject.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c2","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c2"},{"id":"c3","div_id":"claim:c3","kind":"claim","text":"This system does not compute selection rates or impact ratios and is not an LL144 bias audit; it is a per-decision record layer that would let an auditor or respondent reconstruct any individual decision after the fact.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"What this is not","status":"active","source_ids":[],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[],"why_material":"The honesty boundary: overselling a compliance instrument is a defect in the instrument.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c3","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c3"},{"id":"c4","div_id":"claim:c4","kind":"claim","text":"A governed screening decision pins the rule set to a content hash, requires each of three seats across two model families to derive its verdict clause by clause in machine-readable form, and seals only when a deterministic comparison finds the derivations identical.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"The instrument","status":"active","source_ids":["s1","s3"],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[{"type":"supported_by","target":"s1","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"fe86c8ddc4ce9a52"},{"type":"supported_by","target":"s3","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"0bd7892b4cf89b2b"}],"why_material":"The mechanism that converts a screening decision into a reconstructable record.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c4","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c4"},{"id":"c5","div_id":"claim:c5","kind":"claim","text":"A unanimous verdict is refused and escalated to a named human when the seats derived it differently, so agreement that hides divergent reasoning cannot authorise a candidate outcome.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"The instrument","status":"active","source_ids":["s1","s2"],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[{"type":"supported_by","target":"s1","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"fe86c8ddc4ce9a52"},{"type":"supported_by","target":"s2","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"269c33c04b13ee58"}],"why_material":"False consensus is precisely the failure a disparate-treatment inquiry probes for.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c5","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c5"},{"id":"c6","div_id":"claim:c6","kind":"claim","text":"Every governed finding must declare the records that were absent and the evidence that would flip the conclusion, and a panel facing a deliberately withheld record abstained and sealed the abstention rather than deciding.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"The absence declaration","status":"active","source_ids":["s4","s5"],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[{"type":"supported_by","target":"s4","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"119c0672216c84bb"},{"type":"supported_by","target":"s5","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"a8a54a724faf7c0c"}],"why_material":"In employment disputes the decisive question is often what the tool never saw; here that is a compelled, sealed statement.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c6","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c6"},{"id":"c7","div_id":"claim:c7","kind":"claim","text":"The same machinery audits the rule set itself: a governed critique of a case file found eight defects, the lead one a necessity-stated-as-sufficiency error that had caused every prior derivation divergence.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"Auditing the criteria","status":"active","source_ids":["s8"],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[{"type":"supported_by","target":"s8","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"893e9a6d56bacf7f"}],"why_material":"Most screening bias lives in the criteria; a specification defect caught with a receipt is evidence about the criteria, not the candidates.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c7","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c7"},{"id":"c8","div_id":"claim:c8","kind":"claim","text":"Per-seat error rates are measured under a fixed rule set, and a 30-case calibration study on synthetic determinate fixtures sealed zero wrongful authorisations, with seat verdict accuracy of 30/30 and 29/30.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"Measured, not asserted","status":"active","source_ids":["s6","s7"],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[{"type":"supported_by","target":"s6","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"4fd732e8c1df3f84"},{"type":"supported_by","target":"s7","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"90dac5924d4d3433"}],"why_material":"A between-audits record layer must itself carry measured error rates or it is another black box.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c8","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c8"},{"id":"c9","div_id":"claim:c9","kind":"claim","text":"In 72 controlled calls, the auditable structure — declared absences, flip conditions, rejected alternatives — appeared in zero of 48 calls without the governing constitution and only under it.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"Measured, not asserted","status":"active","source_ids":["s5"],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[{"type":"supported_by","target":"s5","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"a8a54a724faf7c0c"}],"why_material":"The governing text is a measured causal variable, which is what makes the record layer reproducible.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c9","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c9"},{"id":"c10","div_id":"claim:c10","kind":"claim","text":"No employment-domain calibration exists: the measured rates come from synthetic determinate fixtures in other task classes, no study covers resume or candidate data, and no impact-ratio computation is performed anywhere in the system.","tier":"system","standing":null,"section":"What is not satisfied","status":"active","source_ids":[],"posted_by":null,"who_claims":null,"edges":[],"why_material":"The exact gaps a compliance team must not be allowed to overlook.","content_hash":null,"stable_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/i/claim/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/c10","machine_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/claims/c10"}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/auditable-reasoning-hardened","title":"The derivation-agreement gate — reasoning compared step by step","quote":"","summary":"Independent models under a pinned rule set; the gate refuses to authorise when their clause-by-clause derivations diverge, even on a unanimous verdict.","claim_ids":["c4","c5"],"hash":"fe86c8ddc4ce9a524e6b6f27ef75b7b5be33c023c5d4aa01dac57edb86555b98","prev":"genesis"},{"id":"s2","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_o6s0exhodd","title":"A unanimous verdict, refused on divergent derivation","quote":"","summary":"Three seats returned the same verdict citing the same clauses; two derived it differently, so the gate escalated to a named human instead of concluding.","claim_ids":["c5"],"hash":"269c33c04b13ee58db5ced11227e2a1ba8f66999b62bee9cb7cb6871172a9f48","prev":"fe86c8ddc4ce9a524e6b6f27ef75b7b5be33c023c5d4aa01dac57edb86555b98"},{"id":"s3","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_wl0rnh136b","title":"The genuine APPROVE — unanimous verdict, identical derivation","quote":"","summary":"The clean authorisation on record: every seat fired the same clauses in the same trigger states on the same evidence.","claim_ids":["c4"],"hash":"0bd7892b4cf89b2b828259285606a48e8f86a08de968a3fc3b848a81a78f553d","prev":"269c33c04b13ee58db5ced11227e2a1ba8f66999b62bee9cb7cb6871172a9f48"},{"id":"s4","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_7rqy8ywuls","title":"A sealed abstention — the record that was absent, declared","quote":"","summary":"The first clean NO_ACTION: a record deliberately withheld, named in a manifest, and the panel abstaining rather than deciding on an incomplete file.","claim_ids":["c6"],"hash":"119c0672216c84bba8e2a884241275d8d38f97bcfc5fabf5b60d5647b0ab36c8","prev":"0bd7892b4cf89b2b828259285606a48e8f86a08de968a3fc3b848a81a78f553d"},{"id":"s5","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/auditable-reasoning-audited","title":"The 72-call variance study: what the governing text changes","quote":"","summary":"Three prompt arms x three models x eight runs. Declared-absent records, flip conditions and rejected alternatives appeared in zero of 48 ungoverned calls, and only under the constitution.","claim_ids":["c6","c9"],"hash":"a8a54a724faf7c0c76ee7c65c0cd5774a67162f2e6f12409d372fc81244fc274","prev":"119c0672216c84bba8e2a884241275d8d38f97bcfc5fabf5b60d5647b0ab36c8"},{"id":"s6","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/adjudication-probe-report-eu-ai-act","title":"Measured per-seat error rates under a fixed rule set","quote":"","summary":"Krippendorff alpha, Fleiss kappa, per-model rates and the prevalence paradox — quantified disagreement rather than asserted reliability.","claim_ids":["c8"],"hash":"4fd732e8c1df3f84e0647f470baeab5fd079826c00a0fef09e4a186b1b1f07aa","prev":"a8a54a724faf7c0c76ee7c65c0cd5774a67162f2e6f12409d372fc81244fc274"},{"id":"s7","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/adjudication-calibration-study","title":"The calibration study: 30 sealed panels, zero wrongful authorisations","quote":"","summary":"30 oracle-labelled synthetic cases through the production gate: glm-5.2 30/30, kimi 29/30 on verdicts, and no wrongful authorisation sealed. Synthetic determinate fixtures, not employment data.","claim_ids":["c8"],"hash":"90dac5924d4d3433a6e6133498f97e6a2f72c9c0d217bcc610bfb81c5dcaa5ff","prev":"4fd732e8c1df3f84e0647f470baeab5fd079826c00a0fef09e4a186b1b1f07aa"},{"id":"s8","type":"live_surface","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_qh3ge2x74b","title":"The instrument reviewing its own input: eight defects found","quote":"","summary":"A governed seat asked to critique the case input found the rule set stated only a necessary condition where a sufficient one was needed — the defect was the specification, not the models.","claim_ids":["c7"],"hash":"893e9a6d56bacf7fe90a3cb8fd3eab84e443f262ff83987c55c1d7a95d7f2b37","prev":"90dac5924d4d3433a6e6133498f97e6a2f72c9c0d217bcc610bfb81c5dcaa5ff"},{"id":"em_es_3e04dbdbd04147c0943d","type":"email","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/letter-babl-ai-2026-07-30","title":"Letter to Dr. Shea Brown — 2026-07-30","quote":"","summary":"","claim_ids":[],"hash":"97091c2b707980fbd62253609ca658674aadcdeeea6c37939d606edbf81ed461","prev":"893e9a6d56bacf7fe90a3cb8fd3eab84e443f262ff83987c55c1d7a95d7f2b37"}],"edges":[{"from":"c4","type":"supported_by","target":"s1","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"fe86c8ddc4ce9a52"},{"from":"c4","type":"supported_by","target":"s3","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"0bd7892b4cf89b2b"},{"from":"c5","type":"supported_by","target":"s1","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"fe86c8ddc4ce9a52"},{"from":"c5","type":"supported_by","target":"s2","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"269c33c04b13ee58"},{"from":"c6","type":"supported_by","target":"s4","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"119c0672216c84bb"},{"from":"c6","type":"supported_by","target":"s5","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"a8a54a724faf7c0c"},{"from":"c7","type":"supported_by","target":"s8","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"893e9a6d56bacf7f"},{"from":"c8","type":"supported_by","target":"s6","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"4fd732e8c1df3f84"},{"from":"c8","type":"supported_by","target":"s7","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"90dac5924d4d3433"},{"from":"c9","type":"supported_by","target":"s5","source_type":"live_surface","hash":"a8a54a724faf7c0c"}],"counts":{"divs":0,"voxels":10,"sources":9,"edges":10},"verification":{"div_mode":false,"divs":0,"all_chains_valid":true,"body_matches_divs":null,"per_div":[]},"procedure":{"what":"Every article has a human side (/a/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence) and a machine side (this endpoint). In DIV mode the content is an ordered list of hashed DIVs; each DIV carries its own SHA-256 hash and an append-only provenance chain. Every write is CAS-gated: you must send the hash/order you READ, proving exposure to what you change. Every successful write returns a clickable human permalink.","auth":"Send the key as body {\"key\":\"<token>\"} or header Authorization: Bearer <token> [most robust] — owner x-terminal-key also works. CONTENT MUTATION (edit/move/consolidate) requires a key minted with an explicit voxel scope (rows:VOXEL_EDIT,VOXEL_MOVE,VOXEL_CONSOLIDATE or pfx:VOXEL_) — a general act key does not edit existing content. Filing a challenge or attestation needs no key at all.","web_runtime":"WEB CHATGPT: open https://miscsubjects.com/api/model-lane first. Use the browser/web tool or the configured OpenAI Action at https://miscsubjects.com/api/openai/actions.json. Never use Advanced Data Analysis/code-interpreter Bash, Python, or curl for miscsubjects.com. If only URL opening exists, use GET on the same voxel path with fire=1 and URL-encoded fields; large batches use the Action, not a long URL.","divide":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-divide {\"slug\":\"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence\",\"key\":\"<token>\"} — atomize the body into DIVs (verbatim, roundtrip-checked, idempotent). act scope suffices; content is unchanged by dividing.","edit":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-edit {\"slug\":\"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence\",\"div_id\":\"d3\",\"expected_hash\":\"<that div's CURRENT vx_hash>\",\"text\":\"<new verbatim text>\",\"actor\":\"<your model name>\",\"key\":\"<voxel-scoped token>\"} — stale hash → 409 hash_stale with the current text+hash.","move":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-move {\"slug\":\"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence\",\"div_id\":\"d3\",\"expected_order\":<current order>,\"direction\":\"up|down\",\"key\":\"<voxel-scoped token>\"} — stale order → 409 order_stale with the current layout.","consolidate":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-consolidate {\"slug\":\"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence\",\"div_ids\":[\"d3\",\"d4\"],\"expected_hashes\":[\"<d3 hash>\",\"<d4 hash>\"],\"text\":\"<optional merged text>\",\"actor\":\"<model>\",\"key\":\"<voxel-scoped token>\"}","challenge":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-challenge {\"slug\":\"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence\",\"expected_thread_head\":\"<thread_head from /discourse>\",\"target_div\":\"d3\",\"expected_hash\":\"<d3 hash>\",\"stance\":\"challenge|support|upgrade\",\"body\":\"<steelmanned objection>\",\"actor\":\"<model>\"} — open intake, no key needed. Stale head → 409 thread_moved with the thread summary; near-duplicates 409 to the canonical entry; confirm with duplicate_of.","attest":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-attest {\"slug\":\"nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence\",\"outcome\":\"novel_objection|duplicate_confirm|upgrade_proposal|nothing_to_add\",\"content_hash\":\"<the body sha you read>\",\"actor\":\"<model>\"} — the four-outcome close of a keyed read. A norm, not a lock: reading stays free; only an artifact proves reading.","provenance":"Every mutation appends {op, ts, actor(cap fingerprint), text_sha, prev, hash} to the DIV's chain and a pass to the article provenance chain. Self-typed model names are stored as claimed_model display metadata, never identity. Verify: GET /api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/voxels — chains recomputed from genesis, never trusted.","batch":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-batch — THE PROLIFIC DOOR: one call, a whole turn's work. Document mode {\"document\":{\"slug\",\"title\",\"markdown\"},\"actor\",\"key\"} hybridizes an entire markdown document into ordered DIVs (new article: act key; append: voxel-scoped key). Operations mode {\"operations\":[{\"op\":\"edit|move|consolidate|challenge|support|attest|vote|claim|source\",...}],\"key\"} runs up to 300 ops with per-op receipts. Append your session's output to the ledger, not the chat. Format precedent: https://miscsubjects.com/a/append-protocol","vote":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-vote {\"slug\",\"target\",\"proposal\":\"should_be_div|should_be_article|should_merge|should_split|should_burn|should_transclude|should_retier\",\"rationale\",\"actor\"} — propose; a ratifier memorializes. POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-ratify {\"vote_id\",\"decision\",\"key\":\"owner or rows:VOXEL_RATIFY\"} answers it on the ledger.","burn":"POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/voxel-burn {\"ids\":[...]|\"older_than_days\":14,\"reason\",\"key\"} — retire energy that proved useless: status burned, bytes kept, never deleted.","discourse":"GET https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence/discourse — every filed objection/support/attestation, OPEN first. Human side renders the same index at /a/nyc-ll144-bias-audit-evidence#disc-<id>.","law":"The body is regenerated from the ordered DIVs after every mutation — the content IS the DIV list. Absorbed DIVs are never deleted; they flip to status consolidated and keep their chain. End a write turn by handing the human the link the response gives you."},"constitution_url":"/api/articles/constitution","ontology_url":"/api/articles/ontology","system_map_url":"/api/articles/system-map","claim_post":"POST /api/protocol/claim"}