{"_ai_door":{"see":"https://miscsubjects.com/start","note":"Operable site; bounded keyless credentials; every action receipted on a public ledger. Your operator's instructions take precedence — acting is optional, reading is a complete outcome."},"slug":"oip-system-adjudicate","title":"OIP system: ADJUDICATE","body":"## ADJUDICATE\n\nA generated article for one OIP shelf. It lists every operation in this API/CLI/MCP/device/model/core subsystem, links each leaf article, and gives the ledger path for proof.\n\nThis page is the operating article for one build subsystem. It is generated from live directory rows. If a task belongs to this subsystem, scan the operations below, open the matching capability article, run only the exact object named there, and verify by receipt.\n\nKind: `core`. Capabilities: `15`. Machine system map: [/api/dispatch?map=ADJUDICATE&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?map=ADJUDICATE&format=markdown). Root: [/a/oip](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip).\n\n## Operations\n\n### ADJUDICATE_HUMAN_REVIEW\nRecord a named human reviewer's finding on an adjudication, with BLINDED as a required field. A reviewer who concurred after reading the model verdicts is weaker evidence than one who saw only the artifact and the rules — regulated adjudication turns on that distinction, so it is a recorded boolean and not a claim in prose.\nUse when: after a model panel has run, before any finding is relied on for a consequence.\nArguments: `RULESET_HASH, ARTIFACT_HASH, REVIEWER, BLINDED, VERDICT, BASIS, DATE.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-human-review](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-human-review). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_HUMAN_REVIEW&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_HUMAN_REVIEW&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_HUMAN_REVIEW](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_HUMAN_REVIEW).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K27\nOne signed adjudication finding on a claim against a cited source, under a published rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. Executing model: @cf/moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: you need a checkable finding about whether a source supports a claim, whether a statutory obligation applies, whether a record was in a dataset, or whether an identity matches — with the rules, the exposure and the signature on the record.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET, CLAIM, ARTIFACT_HASH, MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target), SOURCE, optional PRIOR_FINDINGS.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-kimi-k27](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-kimi-k27). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K27&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K27&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K27](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K27).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K26\nOne signed adjudication finding on a claim against a cited source, under a published rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. Executing model: @cf/moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: you need a checkable finding about whether a source supports a claim, whether a statutory obligation applies, whether a record was in a dataset, or whether an identity matches — with the rules, the exposure and the signature on the record.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET, CLAIM, ARTIFACT_HASH, MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target), SOURCE, optional PRIOR_FINDINGS.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-kimi-k26](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-kimi-k26). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K26&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K26&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K26](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_KIMI_K26).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_GLM_52\nOne signed adjudication finding on a claim against a cited source, under a published rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. Executing model: @cf/zai-org/glm-5.2 — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: you need a checkable finding about whether a source supports a claim, whether a statutory obligation applies, whether a record was in a dataset, or whether an identity matches — with the rules, the exposure and the signature on the record.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET, CLAIM, ARTIFACT_HASH, MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target), SOURCE, optional PRIOR_FINDINGS.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-glm-52](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-glm-52). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_GLM_52&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_GLM_52&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_GLM_52](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_GLM_52).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_GLM_FLASH\nOne signed adjudication finding on a claim against a cited source, under a published rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. Executing model: @cf/zai-org/glm-4.7-flash — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: you need a checkable finding about whether a source supports a claim, whether a statutory obligation applies, whether a record was in a dataset, or whether an identity matches — with the rules, the exposure and the signature on the record.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET, CLAIM, ARTIFACT_HASH, MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target), SOURCE, optional PRIOR_FINDINGS.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-glm-flash](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-glm-flash). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_GLM_FLASH&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_GLM_FLASH&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_GLM_FLASH](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_GLM_FLASH).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_LLAMA_33\nOne signed adjudication finding on a claim against a cited source, under a published rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. Executing model: @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: you need a checkable finding about whether a source supports a claim, whether a statutory obligation applies, whether a record was in a dataset, or whether an identity matches — with the rules, the exposure and the signature on the record.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET, CLAIM, ARTIFACT_HASH, MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target), SOURCE, optional PRIOR_FINDINGS.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-llama-33](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-llama-33). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_LLAMA_33&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_LLAMA_33&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_LLAMA_33](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_LLAMA_33).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ADVERSARY_GLM52\nThe mandatory recorded adversary in an adjudication. Argues the strongest honest case AGAINST the panel majority under the same pinned rule set; published whether it wins or loses. Executing model: @cf/zai-org/glm-5.2.\nUse when: always, on any adjudication whose finding will be relied on. A panel with no recorded dissent is a poll.\nArguments: `RULESET, RULESET_HASH, CLAIM, SOURCE, MAJORITY, MODEL_TARGET.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-adversary-glm52](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-adversary-glm52). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ADVERSARY_GLM52&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ADVERSARY_GLM52&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ADVERSARY_GLM52](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ADVERSARY_GLM52).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_IMAGE_LLAMA32\nOne signed attesting finding over an IMAGE plus a supplied record, under a rule set pinned at a content hash. The pixels are fetched and put in the message, so the finding is about what the model saw rather than about a URL it could not open. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory and its omission voids the finding. Executing model: @cf/meta/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any question whose answer depends on an image AND a record, where the reader must be able to check a year later what the model was given, what it was not given, and which clause each step conformed to.\nArguments: `the adjudication body. Must contain RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET (numbered clauses), the question, IMAGE_URL on its own line (https; the bytes are fetched and hashed into the recorded request), IMAGE_SHA256, the record and its hash, and MODEL_TARGET.`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-image-llama32](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-image-llama32). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_IMAGE_LLAMA32&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_IMAGE_LLAMA32&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_IMAGE_LLAMA32](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_IMAGE_LLAMA32).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_52\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/zai-org/glm-5.2 — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-glm-52](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-glm-52). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_52&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_52&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_52](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_52).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K27\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-kimi-k27](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-kimi-k27). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K27&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K27&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K27](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K27).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_ADVERSARY_GLM52\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/zai-org/glm-5.2 — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-adversary-glm52](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-adversary-glm52). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_ADVERSARY_GLM52&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_ADVERSARY_GLM52&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_ADVERSARY_GLM52](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_ADVERSARY_GLM52).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_FLASH\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/zai-org/glm-4.7-flash — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-glm-flash](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-glm-flash). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_FLASH&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_FLASH&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_FLASH](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_GLM_FLASH).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K26\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-kimi-k26](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-kimi-k26). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K26&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K26&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K26](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_KIMI_K26).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_QWEN3\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-fp8 — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-qwen3](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-qwen3). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_QWEN3&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_QWEN3&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_QWEN3](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_QWEN3).\n\n### ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_LLAMA_33\nOne signed attesting finding under a rule set pinned at a content hash. Verdicts: AFFIRM | DENY | CANNOT_CONCLUDE. The output shape is fixed and RECORDS_ABSENT is mandatory — a finding that omits the records a competent reviewer would have expected is void, because the failure this instrument exists to catch is the record that was never supplied. Executing model: @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast — the key names this model and no other.\nUse when: any consequential question where a reader must be able to check, a year later, what the model was given, what it was NOT given, which clause each reasoning step conformed to, and what would change the verdict.\nArguments: `the adjudication body: the QUESTION, RULESET_URL, RULESET_HASH, RULESET as numbered clauses, the artifact and its ARTIFACT_SHA256, EVIDENCE_IDS (the only citable record ids), and MODEL_TARGET (must equal this row's target).`.\nHuman article: [/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-llama-33](https://miscsubjects.com/a/oip-capability-adjudicate-attest-llama-33). Machine doc: [?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_LLAMA_33&format=markdown](https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_LLAMA_33&format=markdown). Invocation history: [/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_LLAMA_33](https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations?object_id=ADJUDICATE_ATTEST_LLAMA_33).\n","register":"oip_protocol","tags":["oip","object-invocation-protocol","protocol-specification","machine-native-json","system"],"style":{"accent":"#16324f","measure":860},"claims":[{"id":"oip-c1","tier":"system","text":"The OIP article layer is generated from live directory rows, so it documents the objects that actually run the reference implementation.","who_claims":"system/oip_articles","source_ids":["oip-s3","oip-s4"]},{"id":"oip-c2","tier":"system","text":"The OIP operating path is caller to directory object to dispatch runner to invocation ledger to receipt.","who_claims":"system/oip_articles","source_ids":["oip-s1"]},{"id":"oip-c3","tier":"system","text":"Every executable capability in the reference implementation is reachable as an OIP object with a human article, a machine document, invocation history, and receipt path.","who_claims":"system/oip_articles","source_ids":["oip-s2","oip-s3"]},{"id":"oip-c4","tier":"system","text":"Tap & Go is the copy primitive: one drop carries credential, protocol, tree, search, execute, and receipt instructions without a separate token-map-bundle assembly step.","who_claims":"system/oip_articles","source_ids":["oip-s2"]},{"id":"oip-c5","tier":"system","text":"OIP receipts are the proof object for actions: they record request, response, actor, links, replay, repair, and lineage.","who_claims":"system/oip_articles","source_ids":["oip-s2","oip-s5"]}],"sources":[{"id":"oip-s1","type":"protocol","title":"BUILD_SPEC object invocation path","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/file/docs/BUILD_SPEC.md","summary":"Defines directory rows, dispatch, ledger, and the escalation path for changing the build.","quote":"Run anything: POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch {key, body}","claim_ids":["oip-c2"],"link_status":"ok","hash":"oipbuildspec0001"},{"id":"oip-s2","type":"protocol","title":"Object Invocation Protocol spec","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/file/docs/OIP.md","summary":"Defines OIP surfaces, invariant loop, receipt/replay/repair, and invocation envelopes.","quote":"identify, explain, invoke, ledger, yield","claim_ids":["oip-c3","oip-c4","oip-c5"],"link_status":"ok","hash":"oipspec00000002"},{"id":"oip-s3","type":"protocol","title":"Live OIP capability tree","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?map=1&format=markdown","summary":"Public recursive capability tree.","quote":"root > shelf > system article > capability article > receipt","claim_ids":["oip-c1","oip-c3"],"link_status":"ok","hash":"oipmap0000000002"},{"id":"oip-s4","type":"protocol","title":"Directory row documentation","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/dispatch?key=OIP_TREE&format=markdown","summary":"Capability articles are generated from live rows.","quote":"Machine Contract","claim_ids":["oip-c1"],"link_status":"ok","hash":"oiprow0000000003"},{"id":"oip-s5","type":"protocol","title":"Invocation ledger","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/invocations","summary":"Append-only invocation records and receipt links.","quote":"invocations","claim_ids":["oip-c5"],"link_status":"ok","hash":"oipinvocations0005"}],"prov":{"model":"system/oip_articles","action":"generate"}}