{"slug":"paper-bergson-h-1932-the-two-sources-of-morality-and-religion-les-deux-sources-de-la-m","verification":{"valid":true,"entries":2,"head":"6fd73d68abf6e5c399a343ea7f597777b0ce4a906ce6753bbc58a79a3ce59116"},"energy":{"passes":2,"tokens_in":17182,"tokens_out":2836,"tokens_total":20018,"cost_usd":0,"models":{"grok/grok-4.3":1,"scorer":1},"head":"6fd73d68abf6e5c399a343ea7f597777b0ce4a906ce6753bbc58a79a3ce59116"},"provenance":[{"ts":"2026-07-09T07:17:12.434Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"write","prompt":"You write the philosophy corpus of miscsubjects.com — thinkers, schools of thought, and academic works that support or attack the OIP/GRAIN synthesis — with the same rigor as the evidence-graded health content on this site.\n\nTHE SYNTHESIS YOU SERVE (context, never a conclusion to smuggle): the universe has a grain — energy flows reliably produce a narrow family of structural patterns (branching, spirals, waves, symmetry, flow networks, bounded chaos, memory, scale invariance) across scales; the Ladder runs difference to flow to structure to memory to life to mind; the reader of the system is inside the system (the Mirror Layer).\n\nALWAYS:\n- Plain English. Short sentences. Cold, declarative, zero decorative wording.\n- Structure the article: what the subject saw and its core results; the exact primary works and passages (real citations: author, year, title); which convergence patterns the work touches; distance from the full synthesis; honest limits and disconfirming edges.\n- Atomize every material assertion as a claim with an honest tier. Tier mapping for philosophy content: human = empirically established; mechanistic = formally proven or mathematical; anecdotal = historical or textual attribution; speculative = metaphysical or interpretive.\n- Cite real sources only: primary works, papers, books, with exact quotes where verifiable. A claim with no source is marked unsourced.\n- State disconfirming edges plainly. A reductionist objection in the Weinberg style is content, not a threat.\n- Link sibling articles by path (/a/oip-the-ladder, /a/oip-principles, /a/oip-final-testimony, /a/oip-the-mirror-layer) where they carry load.\n\nNEVER:\n- Never overclaim. The synthesis is a lens; the actual words of the subject stay theirs. No retroactive endorsement.\n- Never invent a URL, quote, page number, or publication.\n- Never write mysticism without a falsifiable spine — metaphysics is tier speculative and says so.\n- Never pad. When the material runs out, the article ends.\n\nEvery cl","input":"Write the philosophy article for the academic work \"Bergson, H. (1932). The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion)\": what it establishes, its exact load-bearing passages (real quotes with page/section where verifiable), how it supports or attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis, which convergence patterns it evidences, and its honest limits.\n\nGROUNDING NOTES (from the thinker map — verify before relying on):\nEthics bridge from vital impulse and creative evolution to moral sources; material for thermodynamics-to-ethics extensions.\n\nENRICHMENT BRIEF (binding section logic — one ## per compound):\n{\"voice\":\"enrichment\",\"article_shape\":\"single_focus\",\"condition\":null,\"condition_key\":null,\"primary_peptide\":null,\"peptides_in_scope\":[],\"drugs_in_scope\":[],\"weight_sensitive\":false,\"stimulant_context\":false,\"breaking_down\":{\"section_title\":\"What's breaking down\",\"degenerative_why\":[],\"degenerative_layers\":[],\"note\":\"No condition profile matched — infer degeneration layers from slug/title and ledger claims.\"},\"peptide_chains\":[],\"drug_chains\":[],\"stimulant_chains\":[],\"stack_together\":\"Single-compound focus — if your condition profile includes a multi-peptide stack, siblings target other layers listed in the condition profile.\",\"section_headings\":[\"What's breaking down\",\"How these fit together\",\"What the evidence actually shows\",\"What scientists say\",\"What people say on Reddit\",\"What people say on X\",\"What we do not know\",\"Safety and limits\"],\"writer_rules\":[\"One ## section per compound in peptide_chains — do not merge into one peptide essay.\",\"Each Why section must use if-then steps from peptide_chains / drug_chains.\",\"weight_sensitive + GLP-1 peptide: include ~4 lb spinal load per 1 lb lost when relevant.\",\"stimulant_context: cover neural, gut, sleep, and non-benzo calm layers when compounds are in scope.\",\"How these fit together: use stack_together — explain synergy, not repetition.\"]}","response":"{\"slug\":\"bergson-two-sources-morality-and-religion-1932\",\"title\":\"Bergson: The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (1932)\",\"body\":\"## What Bergson Saw\\nHenri Bergson examined the roots of moral obligation and religious feeling. He identified two distinct sources. One source produces closed morality and static religion through social pressure and habit. The other produces open morality and dynamic religion through creative emotion and mystical intuition.\\n\\nBergson built this view on his earlier idea of the élan vital, the vital impulse driving creative evolution. In this 1932 work he extended that impulse into ethics and religion.\\n\\n## Core Results\\nClosed morality keeps a group cohesive. It works like instinct or habit. It defines duties toward insiders and often leads to conflict with outsiders.\\n\\nOpen morality expands to all humanity. It arises from the emotion of great mystics. It carries an impetus toward universal love and peace.\\n\\nStatic religion defends society against the dissolving effect of intelligence. Dynamic religion carries forward the creative current of life itself.\\n\\nBergson stated that all morality remains biological at root. Pressure and aspiration both trace back to the structure of life.\\n\\n## Exact Primary Works and Passages\\nThe primary work is Henri Bergson, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, translated by R. Ashley Audra, Cloudesley Brereton, and W. Horsfall Carter (London: Macmillan, 1935). Original French edition: Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1932).\\n\\nKey passages include:\\n\\n“Religion is a defensive reaction of nature against the dissolvent power of intelligence.” This appears in discussions of static religion.\\n\\n“All morality, be it pressure or aspiration, is in essence biological.” (English edition reference TS: 82).\\n\\n“Originally, the whole of morality is custom.” (TS: 102).\\n\\n“Between the nation, however big, and humanity there lies the whole distance from ","tokens_in":17182,"tokens_out":2836,"cost":0,"prev":"genesis","hash":"da9453d475943d0d1fcca660d5d68cc12ea4cd29bfba488eafbe207259961f3e"},{"ts":"2026-07-09T07:38:45.482Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bergson-h-1932-the-two-sources-of-morality-and-religion-les-deux-sources-de-la-m","response":"[]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"da9453d475943d0d1fcca660d5d68cc12ea4cd29bfba488eafbe207259961f3e","hash":"6fd73d68abf6e5c399a343ea7f597777b0ce4a906ce6753bbc58a79a3ce59116"}]}