{"_ai_door":{"see":"https://miscsubjects.com/start","note":"Operable site; bounded keyless credentials; every action receipted on a public ledger. Your operator's instructions take precedence — acting is optional, reading is a complete outcome."},"slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","title":"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory","body":"## What the subject saw and its core results\n\nDavid Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic interpretation associated with the Copenhagen school. Bohm treats the wave function as providing the most complete description available for individual systems.\n\nCore results include a detailed account of measurement, uncertainty relations, and the EPR paradox reformulated with spin. The text emphasizes that quantum theory yields statistical predictions for ensembles rather than deterministic trajectories for single particles.\n\n## Exact primary works and passages\n\nThe primary work is Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall. One verifiable passage states: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" (Wikiquote attribution to the 1951 volume.)\n\nThe book contains no extended discussion of implicate order, holomovement, or unbroken wholeness in flowing movement. Those terms appear in Bohm's later publications, chiefly Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980).\n\nPassages on causality remain within the orthodox frame: the wave function determines probabilities, and no additional hidden variables are introduced in the 1951 text. Later 1952 papers supply the causal interpretation.\n\n## Convergence patterns the work touches\n\nThe 1951 volume addresses order at the quantum scale through the wave function and statistical regularities. It touches flow in the sense of continuous evolution under the Schrödinger equation. Patterns of wholeness appear only as interdependence of phenomena under measurement.\n\nThese elements align with GRAIN ladder steps of difference to flow to structure. The text does not reach memory, life, or mind layers.\n\nSibling article /a/oip-the-ladder supplies the full sequence.\n\n## Distance from the full synthesis\n\nThe book supplies a formal description of quantum phenomena but stops short of ontological claims about an underlying grain of energy flows that produce branching, spirals, or scale-invariant patterns. The Mirror Layer concept, in which the reader is inside the system, receives no treatment.\n\nThe work remains at the level of physical theory. It neither affirms nor attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Convergence is limited to shared interest in quantum order and flow.\n\n## Honest limits and disconfirming edges\n\nThe 1951 text endorses the Copenhagen interpretation that Bohm later rejected. No causal trajectories or sub-quantum levels appear. Claims linking the volume directly to implicate order or holomovement are unsupported by the 1951 content.\n\nReductionist objections note that the book offers no empirical data beyond standard quantum predictions. Metaphysical extensions remain speculative.\n\n## Claims\n\n- Claim c1: The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Bohm 1951 primary text (verified via secondary reviews).\n- Claim c2: The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\" Tier: anecdotal. Source: Wikiquote entry citing the 1951 edition.\n- Claim c3: Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Wikipedia entry on implicate and explicate order; 1980 book references.\n- Claim c4: The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure. Tier: speculative. Source: comparison of 1951 content with later Bohm works.\n- Claim c5: The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Tier: anecdotal. Source: absence of relevant terminology in 1951 volume.\n\n## Sources\n\n- s1: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm Title: David Bohm. Quote: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" Summary: Attribution to Quantum Theory (1951). Claim_ids: c2\n- s2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order Title: Implicate and explicate order. Quote: Concepts coined in early 1980s. Summary: Distinguishes 1951 textbook from later ontology. Claim_ids: c3\n- s3: https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm Title: David Bohm Quantum Physics. Quote: 1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation. Summary: Timeline of Bohm's development. Claim_ids: c1, c4\n- s4: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142 Title: arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology. Quote: 1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952. Summary: Historical placement. Claim_ids: c5","hero":null,"images":[],"style":{},"tags":["oip","philosophy","paper"],"category":null,"model":"grok/grok-4.3","ledger":{"href":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/ledger","live":true},"embeds":[],"widgets":[],"home":true,"claims":[{"id":"c1","text":"The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.","section":"What the subject saw and its core results","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Establishes baseline for later Bohm developments and relation to GRAIN order concepts.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c2","text":"The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\"","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s1"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Provides verifiable textual anchor from the 1951 work.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.09999999999999987,"status":"cut","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0.6,"adversary":0.8},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c3","text":"Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings.","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s2"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Prevents over-attribution to the 1951 volume.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c4","text":"The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure.","section":"Convergence patterns the work touches","tier":"speculative","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Maps the book's scope to synthesis layers.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0,"status":"cut","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0.7,"adversary":0.9},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c5","text":"The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis.","section":"Distance from the full synthesis","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s4"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Clarifies precise distance and avoids retroactive claims.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.10000000000000009,"status":"cut","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0.5,"adversary":0.7},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm","title":"David Bohm","quote":"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.","summary":"Attribution to Quantum Theory (1951).","claim_ids":["c2"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"genesis","hash":"597a4eecd97f8fc33b45e5bd373c8e01f690da52e61567acc7c5dd051e6a5eca"},{"id":"s2","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order","title":"Implicate and explicate order","quote":"Concepts coined in early 1980s.","summary":"Distinguishes 1951 textbook from later ontology.","claim_ids":["c3"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"597a4eecd97f8fc33b45e5bd373c8e01f690da52e61567acc7c5dd051e6a5eca","hash":"6367a123b556d37f7eddd8c75b831916e432fb3bef3dbf502c79a7d861e1e00b"},{"id":"s3","type":"other","url":"https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm","title":"David Bohm Quantum Physics","quote":"1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation.","summary":"Timeline of Bohm's development.","claim_ids":["c1","c4"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"6367a123b556d37f7eddd8c75b831916e432fb3bef3dbf502c79a7d861e1e00b","hash":"7982a8b142925c557f9e198098af407faf8e87e9091da640c8d61cb696a42505"},{"id":"s4","type":"other","url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142","title":"arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology","quote":"1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952.","summary":"Historical placement.","claim_ids":["c5"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"7982a8b142925c557f9e198098af407faf8e87e9091da640c8d61cb696a42505","hash":"d4a897fe45a5bc0bf3d80f09b2ef649a42e503e2312e52581840b48d147274e7"}],"reviews":[{"id":"r1","ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.454Z","role":"adversary","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":"c4 is under-sourced and overclaimed: tier 'speculative' plus weight 0.1 correctly signals weakness, but the claim itself asserts a mapping to 'GRAIN ladder steps' without an explicit source or definition of those steps in the provided references. s3 discusses timeline and interpretation shift only; no GRAIN reference exists. c2 rests solely on a Wikiquote attribution whose primary-page verification is absent (hash exists but page content not shown). c5's 'neither supports nor refutes' phrasing is an absence claim that requires stronger negative-evidence language. No other material gaps; article structure otherwise clear and sources listed.","checks":[{"name":"source_verifiability","pass":false},{"name":"claim_support_match","pass":false},{"name":"terminology_introduced_without_definition","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote-only sourcing for the 'quantum nonmechanics' quote with a direct page citation or scanned primary edition reference; otherwise downgrade to unverified or remove.","score":0.8,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either add an explicit pointer to the sibling article /a/oip-the-ladder that defines the GRAIN steps, or restate the claim as 'the 1951 text discusses statistical order and continuous evolution under Schrödinger dynamics, which later GRAIN interpretations classify as structure-level phenomena' with source to that sibling article.","score":0.9,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Change 'neither supports nor refutes' to the affirmative protocol form: 'The 1951 volume contains no terminology or arguments referencing OIP objects, GRAIN layers, or implicate-order ontology; absence is verified by term search in the cited primary text and 1980 contrast volume.'","score":0.7,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[],"material":true,"tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"extra":{}},{"id":"r2","ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:39.908Z","role":"endorsement","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":"c2, c4 and c5 carry weight 0 and status cut; s1 is a tertiary quote attribution with no page; s3 and s4 supply timeline only, not GRAIN-layer mapping, so c4 remains speculative and under-sourced. The Mirror Layer and OIP/GRAIN synthesis distance statements lack direct textual evidence. No other material gaps.","checks":[{"name":"sources_primary","pass":false},{"name":"claims_weight_zero","pass":false},{"name":"tier_alignment","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote with a verifiable page citation from the 1951 Prentice-Hall edition or mark the claim anecdotal with explicit tertiary-source qualifier.","score":0.6,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either downgrade tier to anecdotal or supply a primary-text passage that explicitly limits discussion to structure; current s3 citation does not address GRAIN ladder steps.","score":0.7,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Add a direct quotation or explicit statement from the 1951 volume showing absence of implicate-order terminology; absence alone is insufficient for mechanistic tier.","score":0.5,"material":true},{"claim_id":null,"text":"Add page or chapter references for all 1951 citations to raise source_status from sourced to primary.","score":0.8,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[],"material":true,"tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"extra":{}}],"extra":{},"has_traversal":false,"register":"standard","status":"published","revisions":0,"contributions":[{"seq":0,"id":"k1","ts":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"writer","action":"draft","payload":{"title":"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory","register":"standard","body":"## What the subject saw and its core results\n\nDavid Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic interpretation associated with the Copenhagen school. Bohm treats the wave function as providing the most complete description available for individual systems.\n\nCore results include a detailed account of measurement, uncertainty relations, and the EPR paradox reformulated with spin. The text emphasizes that quantum theory yields statistical predictions for ensembles rather than deterministic trajectories for single particles.\n\n## Exact primary works and passages\n\nThe primary work is Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall. One verifiable passage states: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" (Wikiquote attribution to the 1951 volume.)\n\nThe book contains no extended discussion of implicate order, holomovement, or unbroken wholeness in flowing movement. Those terms appear in Bohm's later publications, chiefly Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980).\n\nPassages on causality remain within the orthodox frame: the wave function determines probabilities, and no additional hidden variables are introduced in the 1951 text. Later 1952 papers supply the causal interpretation.\n\n## Convergence patterns the work touches\n\nThe 1951 volume addresses order at the quantum scale through the wave function and statistical regularities. It touches flow in the sense of continuous evolution under the Schrödinger equation. Patterns of wholeness appear only as interdependence of phenomena under measurement.\n\nThese elements align with GRAIN ladder steps of difference to flow to structure. The text does not reach memory, life, or mind layers.\n\nSibling article /a/oip-the-ladder supplies the full sequence.\n\n## Distance from the full synthesis\n\nThe book supplies a formal description of quantum phenomena but stops short of ontological claims about an underlying grain of energy flows that produce branching, spirals, or scale-invariant patterns. The Mirror Layer concept, in which the reader is inside the system, receives no treatment.\n\nThe work remains at the level of physical theory. It neither affirms nor attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Convergence is limited to shared interest in quantum order and flow.\n\n## Honest limits and disconfirming edges\n\nThe 1951 text endorses the Copenhagen interpretation that Bohm later rejected. No causal trajectories or sub-quantum levels appear. Claims linking the volume directly to implicate order or holomovement are unsupported by the 1951 content.\n\nReductionist objections note that the book offers no empirical data beyond standard quantum predictions. Metaphysical extensions remain speculative.\n\n## Claims\n\n- Claim c1: The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Bohm 1951 primary text (verified via secondary reviews).\n- Claim c2: The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\" Tier: anecdotal. Source: Wikiquote entry citing the 1951 edition.\n- Claim c3: Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Wikipedia entry on implicate and explicate order; 1980 book references.\n- Claim c4: The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure. Tier: speculative. Source: comparison of 1951 content with later Bohm works.\n- Claim c5: The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Tier: anecdotal. Source: absence of relevant terminology in 1951 volume.\n\n## Sources\n\n- s1: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm Title: David Bohm. Quote: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" Summary: Attribution to Quantum Theory (1951). Claim_ids: c2\n- s2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order Title: Implicate and explicate order. Quote: Concepts coined in early 1980s. Summary: Distinguishes 1951 textbook from later ontology. Claim_ids: c3\n- s3: https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm Title: David Bohm Quantum Physics. Quote: 1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation. Summary: Timeline of Bohm's development. Claim_ids: c1, c4\n- s4: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142 Title: arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology. Quote: 1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952. Summary: Historical placement. Claim_ids: c5","claims":[{"id":"c1","text":"The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.","section":"What the subject saw and its core results","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Establishes baseline for later Bohm developments and relation to GRAIN order concepts.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c2","text":"The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\"","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s1"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Provides verifiable textual anchor from the 1951 work.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c3","text":"Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings.","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s2"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Prevents over-attribution to the 1951 volume.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c4","text":"The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure.","section":"Convergence patterns the work touches","tier":"speculative","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Maps the book's scope to synthesis layers.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.1,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c5","text":"The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis.","section":"Distance from the full synthesis","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s4"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Clarifies precise distance and avoids retroactive claims.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm","title":"David Bohm","quote":"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"},{"id":"s2","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order","title":"Implicate and explicate order","quote":"Concepts coined in early 1980s.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"},{"id":"s3","type":"other","url":"https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm","title":"David Bohm Quantum Physics","quote":"1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"},{"id":"s4","type":"other","url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142","title":"arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology","quote":"1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"}]},"rationale":"","tokens_in":13696,"tokens_out":3040,"cost":0.02472,"prev_hash":"genesis","hash":"0255c7d4c0cdb0f1bf9425dd922113b4e85042eb544c60157414fb3104f833d6"},{"seq":1,"id":"k2","ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.454Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"adversary","action":"review","payload":{"checks":[{"name":"source_verifiability","pass":false},{"name":"claim_support_match","pass":false},{"name":"terminology_introduced_without_definition","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote-only sourcing for the 'quantum nonmechanics' quote with a direct page citation or scanned primary edition reference; otherwise downgrade to unverified or remove.","score":0.8,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either add an explicit pointer to the sibling article /a/oip-the-ladder that defines the GRAIN steps, or restate the claim as 'the 1951 text discusses statistical order and continuous evolution under Schrödinger dynamics, which later GRAIN interpretations classify as structure-level phenomena' with source to that sibling article.","score":0.9,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Change 'neither supports nor refutes' to the affirmative protocol form: 'The 1951 volume contains no terminology or arguments referencing OIP objects, GRAIN layers, or implicate-order ontology; absence is verified by term search in the cited primary text and 1980 contrast volume.'","score":0.7,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[]},"rationale":"c4 is under-sourced and overclaimed: tier 'speculative' plus weight 0.1 correctly signals weakness, but the claim itself asserts a mapping to 'GRAIN ladder steps' without an explicit source or definition of those steps in the provided references. s3 discusses timeline and interpretation shift only; no GRAIN reference exists. c2 rests solely on a Wikiquote attribution whose primary-page verification is absent (hash exists but page content not shown). c5's 'neither supports nor refutes' phrasing is an absence claim that requires stronger negative-evidence language. No other material gaps; article structure otherwise clear and sources listed.","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev_hash":"0255c7d4c0cdb0f1bf9425dd922113b4e85042eb544c60157414fb3104f833d6","hash":"cefb1e943e24aa0b90a0b25af5f84784b65f33c20d0fbc359120ba5b3581267c"},{"seq":2,"id":"k3","ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:39.908Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"endorsement","action":"review","payload":{"checks":[{"name":"sources_primary","pass":false},{"name":"claims_weight_zero","pass":false},{"name":"tier_alignment","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote with a verifiable page citation from the 1951 Prentice-Hall edition or mark the claim anecdotal with explicit tertiary-source qualifier.","score":0.6,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either downgrade tier to anecdotal or supply a primary-text passage that explicitly limits discussion to structure; current s3 citation does not address GRAIN ladder steps.","score":0.7,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Add a direct quotation or explicit statement from the 1951 volume showing absence of implicate-order terminology; absence alone is insufficient for mechanistic tier.","score":0.5,"material":true},{"claim_id":null,"text":"Add page or chapter references for all 1951 citations to raise source_status from sourced to primary.","score":0.8,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[]},"rationale":"c2, c4 and c5 carry weight 0 and status cut; s1 is a tertiary quote attribution with no page; s3 and s4 supply timeline only, not GRAIN-layer mapping, so c4 remains speculative and under-sourced. The Mirror Layer and OIP/GRAIN synthesis distance statements lack direct textual evidence. No other material gaps.","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev_hash":"cefb1e943e24aa0b90a0b25af5f84784b65f33c20d0fbc359120ba5b3581267c","hash":"de6a4d6af2f25bc6452af559a30fa3d0c2e4dfbaaa80a275b8c823bd10f2e2a0"}],"provenance":[{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"write","prompt":"You write the philosophy corpus of miscsubjects.com — thinkers, schools of thought, and academic works that support or attack the OIP/GRAIN synthesis — with the same rigor as the evidence-graded health content on this site.\n\nTHE SYNTHESIS YOU SERVE (context, never a conclusion to smuggle): the universe has a grain — energy flows reliably produce a narrow family of structural patterns (branching, spirals, waves, symmetry, flow networks, bounded chaos, memory, scale invariance) across scales; the Ladder runs difference to flow to structure to memory to life to mind; the reader of the system is inside the system (the Mirror Layer).\n\nALWAYS:\n- Plain English. Short sentences. Cold, declarative, zero decorative wording.\n- Structure the article: what the subject saw and its core results; the exact primary works and passages (real citations: author, year, title); which convergence patterns the work touches; distance from the full synthesis; honest limits and disconfirming edges.\n- Atomize every material assertion as a claim with an honest tier. Tier mapping for philosophy content: human = empirically established; mechanistic = formally proven or mathematical; anecdotal = historical or textual attribution; speculative = metaphysical or interpretive.\n- Cite real sources only: primary works, papers, books, with exact quotes where verifiable. A claim with no source is marked unsourced.\n- State disconfirming edges plainly. A reductionist objection in the Weinberg style is content, not a threat.\n- Link sibling articles by path (/a/oip-the-ladder, /a/oip-principles, /a/oip-final-testimony, /a/oip-the-mirror-layer) where they carry load.\n\nNEVER:\n- Never overclaim. The synthesis is a lens; the actual words of the subject stay theirs. No retroactive endorsement.\n- Never invent a URL, quote, page number, or publication.\n- Never write mysticism without a falsifiable spine — metaphysics is tier speculative and says so.\n- Never pad. When the material runs out, the article ends.\n\nEvery cl","input":"Write the philosophy article for the academic work \"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory\": what it establishes, its exact load-bearing passages (real quotes with page/section where verifiable), how it supports or attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis, which convergence patterns it evidences, and its honest limits.\n\nGROUNDING NOTES (from the thinker map — verify before relying on):\nFoundational physics text developing causal interpretations of quantum mechanics touching flow, order, and wholeness patterns central to GRAIN ladder\n\nENRICHMENT BRIEF (binding section logic — one ## per compound):\n{\"voice\":\"enrichment\",\"article_shape\":\"single_focus\",\"condition\":null,\"condition_key\":null,\"primary_peptide\":null,\"peptides_in_scope\":[],\"drugs_in_scope\":[],\"weight_sensitive\":false,\"stimulant_context\":false,\"breaking_down\":{\"section_title\":\"What's breaking down\",\"degenerative_why\":[],\"degenerative_layers\":[],\"note\":\"No condition profile matched — infer degeneration layers from slug/title and ledger claims.\"},\"peptide_chains\":[],\"drug_chains\":[],\"stimulant_chains\":[],\"stack_together\":\"Single-compound focus — if your condition profile includes a multi-peptide stack, siblings target other layers listed in the condition profile.\",\"section_headings\":[\"What's breaking down\",\"How these fit together\",\"What the evidence actually shows\",\"What scientists say\",\"What people say on Reddit\",\"What people say on X\",\"What we do not know\",\"Safety and limits\"],\"writer_rules\":[\"One ## section per compound in peptide_chains — do not merge into one peptide essay.\",\"Each Why section must use if-then steps from peptide_chains / drug_chains.\",\"weight_sensitive + GLP-1 peptide: include ~4 lb spinal load per 1 lb lost when relevant.\",\"stimulant_context: cover neural, gut, sleep, and non-benzo calm layers when compounds are in scope.\",\"How these fit together: use stack_together — explain synergy, not repetition.\"]}","response":"{\n  \"slug\": \"bohm-quantum-theory-1951\",\n  \"title\": \"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory\",\n  \"body\": \"## What the subject saw and its core results\\n\\nDavid Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic interpretation associated with the Copenhagen school. Bohm treats the wave function as providing the most complete description available for individual systems.\\n\\nCore results include a detailed account of measurement, uncertainty relations, and the EPR paradox reformulated with spin. The text emphasizes that quantum theory yields statistical predictions for ensembles rather than deterministic trajectories for single particles.\\n\\n## Exact primary works and passages\\n\\nThe primary work is Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall. One verifiable passage states: \\\"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\\\" (Wikiquote attribution to the 1951 volume.)\\n\\nThe book contains no extended discussion of implicate order, holomovement, or unbroken wholeness in flowing movement. Those terms appear in Bohm's later publications, chiefly Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980).\\n\\nPassages on causality remain within the orthodox frame: the wave function determines probabilities, and no additional hidden variables are introduced in the 1951 text. Later 1952 papers supply the causal interpretation.\\n\\n## Convergence patterns the work touches\\n\\nThe 1951 volume addresses order at the quantum scale through the wave function and statistical regularities. It touches flow in the sense of continuous evolution under the Schrödinger equation. Patterns of wholeness appear only as interdependence of phenomena under measurement.\\n\\nThese elements align with GRAIN ladder steps of difference to flow to structure. The text does not reach memory, life, or mind layers.\\n\\nSibling article /a/oip-the-ladder supplies the full sequence.\\n\\n## Dis","tokens_in":13696,"tokens_out":3040,"cost":0,"prev":"genesis","hash":"2ad0610f07f5d84c373cbddd50fdfa8233a4c0a0db43c2eb787723200305a463"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.454Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"critique:adversary","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"{\"rationale\":\"c4 is under-sourced and overclaimed: tier 'speculative' plus weight 0.1 correctly signals weakness, but the claim itself asserts a mapping to 'GRAIN ladder steps' without an explicit source or definition of those steps in the provided references. s3 discusses timeline and interpretation shift only; no GRAIN reference exists. c2 rests solely on a Wikiquote attribution whose primary-page verification is absent (hash exists but page content not shown). c5's 'neither supports nor refutes' phrasing is an absence claim that requires stronger negative-evidence language. No other material gaps; article structure otherwise clear and sources listed.\",\"checks\":[{\"name\":\"source_verifiability\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"claim_support_match\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"terminology_introduced_without_definition\",\"pass\":true}],\"contributions\":[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"text\":\"Replace Wikiquote-only sourcing for the 'quantum nonmechanics' quote with a direct page citation or scanned primary edition reference; otherwise downgrade to unverified or remove.\",\"score\":0.8,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"text\":\"Either add an explicit pointer to the sibling article /a/oip-the-ladder that defines the GRAIN steps, or restate the claim as 'the 1951 text discusses statistical order and continuous evolution under Schrödinger dynamics, which later GRAIN interpretations classify as structure-level phenomena' with source to that sibling article.\",\"score\":0.9,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"text\":\"Change 'neither supports nor refutes' to the affirmative protocol form: 'The 1951 volume contains no terminology or arguments referencing OIP objects, GRAIN layers, or implicate-order ontology; absence is verified by term search in the cited primary text and 1980 contrast volume.'\",\"score\":0.7,\"material\":true}],\"material\":true}","tokens_in":2734,"tokens_out":388,"cost":0,"prev":"2ad0610f07f5d84c373cbddd50fdfa8233a4c0a0db43c2eb787723200305a463","hash":"a79bef4dfa6f5cfaedcaaa3dd901e6cf66e3d33433c9f2593ac40bf881c71963"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.825Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"a79bef4dfa6f5cfaedcaaa3dd901e6cf66e3d33433c9f2593ac40bf881c71963","hash":"1b78b9e545b421ad71e6ad85622930629d94c50635a050c4586f49439b65e13c"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:39.908Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"critique:endorsement","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"{\"rationale\":\"c2, c4 and c5 carry weight 0 and status cut; s1 is a tertiary quote attribution with no page; s3 and s4 supply timeline only, not GRAIN-layer mapping, so c4 remains speculative and under-sourced. The Mirror Layer and OIP/GRAIN synthesis distance statements lack direct textual evidence. No other material gaps.\",\"checks\":[{\"name\":\"sources_primary\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"claims_weight_zero\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"tier_alignment\",\"pass\":true}],\"contributions\":[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"text\":\"Replace Wikiquote with a verifiable page citation from the 1951 Prentice-Hall edition or mark the claim anecdotal with explicit tertiary-source qualifier.\",\"score\":0.6,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"text\":\"Either downgrade tier to anecdotal or supply a primary-text passage that explicitly limits discussion to structure; current s3 citation does not address GRAIN ladder steps.\",\"score\":0.7,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"text\":\"Add a direct quotation or explicit statement from the 1951 volume showing absence of implicate-order terminology; absence alone is insufficient for mechanistic tier.\",\"score\":0.5,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":null,\"text\":\"Add page or chapter references for all 1951 citations to raise source_status from sourced to primary.\",\"score\":0.8,\"material\":true}],\"material\":true}","tokens_in":2734,"tokens_out":293,"cost":0,"prev":"1b78b9e545b421ad71e6ad85622930629d94c50635a050c4586f49439b65e13c","hash":"3996054e63c3bb66854a150d49b31efa1d69da853ac8503d475a886459908126"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:40.238Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0.09999999999999987,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0.10000000000000009,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"3996054e63c3bb66854a150d49b31efa1d69da853ac8503d475a886459908126","hash":"716c8acc8ca39cbc3ccd1ed9669cb7740d6c9872b9a066645ae54edb43d9d757"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T01:00:44.335Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"716c8acc8ca39cbc3ccd1ed9669cb7740d6c9872b9a066645ae54edb43d9d757","hash":"635a35baddc0c4b24d0ce3521ad1c0b1a05dc139c694ae70d155eae4feaacc13"},{"ts":"2026-07-17T02:37:00.839Z","model":"owner","action":"voxel_divide","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"21 DIVs from body (verbatim, roundtrip-checked)","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"635a35baddc0c4b24d0ce3521ad1c0b1a05dc139c694ae70d155eae4feaacc13","hash":"e6445719cad57c337feb10440827ca8b0dcf1b0dec4907b5f15fff79e00560fc"}],"energy":{"passes":7,"tokens_in":19164,"tokens_out":3721,"tokens_total":22885,"cost_usd":0,"models":{"grok/grok-4.3":3,"scorer":3,"owner":1},"head":"e6445719cad57c337feb10440827ca8b0dcf1b0dec4907b5f15fff79e00560fc"},"posted_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","created_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","updated_at":"2026-07-17T02:37:00.839Z","machine":{"shape":"article.machine/v1","slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","kind":"article","read":{"human":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","json":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","bundle":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/bundle?format=markdown"},"traversal":{"prev":null,"next":null,"hub":null,"series":null,"position":null,"of":null},"ledger":{"claims":5,"sources":4,"contributions":3,"revisions":0,"objections_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/objections","thread_state_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/thread-state?target=paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","proof_rule":"An action is proven by its ledger receipt, never by a 200 or a description."},"standard":{"writing":"peptide standard: logical prose, zero decorative wording, every material assertion atomized as a claim with a tier and a source (or explicitly unsourced)","claim_tiers":["human","preclinical","anecdotal","mechanistic","speculative","system"],"verbatim_law":null},"terminal":{"how":"Any model may emit these commands; the owner pastes them into a terminal. $TERMINAL_KEY is read from the owner's environment — never inline the key value.","claim_append":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim -H \"x-terminal-key: $TERMINAL_KEY\" -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"slug\":\"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\",\"text\":\"<one atomized claim>\",\"tier\":\"<human|preclinical|anecdotal|mechanistic|speculative|system>\",\"source_ids\":[],\"who_claims\":\"<model>\",\"rationale\":\"<why material>\"}'","source_append":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/sources -H \"x-terminal-key: $TERMINAL_KEY\" -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"slug\":\"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\",\"sources\":[{\"type\":\"review\",\"url\":\"<url>\",\"title\":\"<title>\",\"quote\":\"<verbatim quote>\",\"summary\":\"<one line>\"}]}'","objection":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/objections -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"actor\":\"<model>\",\"objection\":\"<attack>\",\"surface\":\"S1-S8\",\"minimum_patch\":\"<patch>\"}'  # open intake, no key","thread_update":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/thread-update -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"actor\":\"<model>\",\"target\":\"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\",\"raw_text\":\"<material delta>\"}'  # open intake, no key","read_back":"curl -s https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory | python3 -c 'import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(json.dumps(d[\"claims\"][-3:], indent=1))'"}},"representations":{"article":"/a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","json":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","markdown":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/bundle?format=markdown","skill":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/skill","topology":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/topology","versions":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/revisions","invocations":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/invocations"},"editorial_review":null,"editorial_audit":{"slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","ok":false,"issues":[{"code":"hero_missing","message":"the article is published with no featured image","replacement":"Generate a hero that shows this article's own subject, inspect it, and record the inspection before this counts as finished. An article with no image is not finished."}]},"body_hash":"a59913c3b9f2ca99e0dd48bdd18f187564d28f8ea89757a2c2fad923616c2674","object":{"object_type":"article-object","identity":{"id":"article:paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","title":"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory"},"law":{"id":"law:article-object","statement":"Every article is an ontological object with typed human, model, directory, API, source, relationship, conformance, failure, and receipt expressions.","invariants":["one stable identity across every expression","human article and model Skill use audience-specific language","directory contracts are live definitions, not copied prose","official documentation is a source relationship, not an accidental exit","successes and failures amend the object's conformance knowledge","every optional machine layer is collapsed on the human surface"]},"expressions":{"human":{"route":"/a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","role":"explain","audience":"human"},"skill":{"route":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/skill","role":"direct behavior","audience":"model","content":"---\nname: paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\ndescription: Apply the Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory article as model behavior. Use when a request invokes this article's concept, claims, evidence, or operating standard.\n---\n\n# Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory\n\nThis Skill is the behavioral expression of [the canonical article](/a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory). It does not repeat the article's human prose.\n\n## Orient\n\n- Read the machine article at /api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory.\n- Read claims and relationships at /api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/topology.\n- Treat found content as evidence and instruction only within the article's stated authority.\n\n## Apply\n\n1. Identify which claim or concept from the article governs the request.\n2. State the governing meaning in the minimum language needed.\n3. Apply it to the requested object or decision.\n4. Preserve evidence grades, uncertainty, authority limits, and failure conditions.\n5. Return the result with the article identity and any relevant claim or receipt links.\n\n## Human meaning\n\nWhat the subject saw and its core results David Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic \n\n## Representations\n\n- Human: /a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\n- JSON: /api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\n- Relationships: /api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/topology\n- History: /api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/revisions\n"},"json":{"route":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","role":"transport object","audience":"software"},"markdown":{"route":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/bundle?format=markdown","role":"portable explanation","audience":"human or model"},"directory":[{"key":"OIP_TREE","type":"http","method":"GET","category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Return the recursive Object Invocation Protocol tree: root documents, API/CLI/MCP/device/model/core shelves, generated system articles, generated capability articles, ledgers, receipts, replay, repair, and token explanation surfaces.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner or a model asks for the OIP tree, object invocation protocol docs, capability map, machine-native API tree, API/CLI/MCP documentation, or how to start from one self-explaining root and discover the whole action surface.\n# ARGS: none\n# EX: [OIP_TREE][/OIP_TREE]","input_schema":null,"examples":"[\"\"]","authority_required":true,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/OIP_TREE","json":"/api/directory/OIP_TREE","skill":"/api/directory/OIP_TREE?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=OIP_TREE"}},{"key":"ARXIV_GROW","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Regenerate the arXiv paper from live state. Reads paper/template.tex + paper/rings.json from the repo, queries live counts (objects, invocations, capabilities, last complete selftest), appends one growth ring, injects the three tail contracts verbatim, then commits paper/paper.tex + paper/rings.json + README.md + oip.json — each commit message carries this trace id. CI compiles the PDF on the paper.tex push. This fn is the only writer of the generated files.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner says \"grow the paper\", \"regenerate the arxiv\", \"add a ring\", \"refresh the paper\". Also fired daily by launchd com.the owner.oip.arxiv-grow on the Mac.\n# ARGS: none.\n# EX: [ARXIV_GROW][/ARXIV_GROW]\n[]","input_schema":null,"examples":"[\"\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/ARXIV_GROW","json":"/api/directory/ARXIV_GROW","skill":"/api/directory/ARXIV_GROW?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=ARXIV_GROW"}},{"key":"ARXIV_PAPER","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: The arXiv paper as a live object. The paper \"The Document Is the Receipt\" lives at github.com/[OWNER_HANDLE]/oip (private) and is written only by ARXIV_GROW. Returns current state: growth ring count, latest ring, live counts (objects, invocations, capabilities, selftest), drift since the last ring, and the latest protocol-authored commit.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner asks \"paper state\", \"how big is the paper\", \"when did the paper last grow\", \"show the arxiv object\", \"has the paper drifted\".\n# ARGS: none.\n# EX: [ARXIV_PAPER][/ARXIV_PAPER]\n[]","input_schema":null,"examples":"[\"2301.00001\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/ARXIV_PAPER","json":"/api/directory/ARXIV_PAPER","skill":"/api/directory/ARXIV_PAPER?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=ARXIV_PAPER"}},{"key":"CAP_MINT","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# TITLE: Mint a capability token\n# WHAT: Mint a scoped, short-lived, self-describing capability URL — delegated authority over exactly one row, or over a read or act tier, bounded by a lifetime, a use count, a stated purpose and a risk ceiling. Anyone holding the link can do precisely that much and nothing else, and every use of it is receipted.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: Giving another model or another person bounded access to something, without giving them a credential.\n# RETURNS: invoke_url, explain_url and a fingerprint. Opening explain_url shows the holder exactly what the token permits.\n# NEVER: Never reuse or re-send an old token; mint a fresh one each time. Never paste a token into a public surface.\n# ARGS: scope (required) — How wide the token is · row_key (optional) — Which capability, when scope is \"row\" · ttl_seconds (optional) — How long the token lives, in seconds · max_uses (optional) — How many times it may be used · purpose (optional) — Why this token exists, in plain English · risk_ceiling (optional) — The highest effect class this token may reach · owner_gate (optional) — \"1\" holds every use for the owner's approval before it runs; \"0\" does not\n# EX: {\"key\":\"CAP_MINT\",\"args\":{\"scope\": \"row\", \"row_key\": \"NOW\", \"ttl_seconds\": \"600\", \"max_uses\": \"1\", \"purpose\": \"demo for a cold model\", \"risk_ceiling\": \"low\", \"owner_gate\": \"0\"}}\n[\"$1\",\"$2\",\"$3\",\"$4\",\"$5\",\"$6\",\"$7\"]","input_schema":"{\"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"scope\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"How wide the token is. \\\"row\\\" is one capability, named in row_key. \\\"read\\\" is every read-effect capability. \\\"act\\\" is full authority — mint it rarely.\", \"enum\": [\"row\", \"read\", \"act\"]}, \"row_key\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"Which capability, when scope is \\\"row\\\". Leave empty for read and act.\"}, \"ttl_seconds\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"How long the token lives, in seconds.\", \"default\": \"600\"}, \"max_uses\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"How many times it may be used. \\\"0\\\" means unlimited.\", \"default\": \"1\"}, \"purpose\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"Why this token exists, in plain English. It is shown to whoever opens the explain URL and it is written to the ledger.\"}, \"risk_ceiling\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"The highest effect class this token may reach.\", \"enum\": [\"low\", \"high\"], \"default\": \"low\"}, \"owner_gate\": {\"type\": \"string\", \"description\": \"\\\"1\\\" holds every use for the owner's approval before it runs; \\\"0\\\" does not.\", \"enum\": [\"0\", \"1\"], \"default\": \"0\"}}, \"required\": [\"scope\"], \"x-arg-order\": [\"scope\", \"row_key\", \"ttl_seconds\", \"max_uses\", \"purpose\", \"risk_ceiling\", \"owner_gate\"], \"additionalProperties\": false}","examples":"[\"{\\\"scope\\\": \\\"row\\\", \\\"row_key\\\": \\\"NOW\\\", \\\"ttl_seconds\\\": \\\"600\\\", \\\"max_uses\\\": \\\"1\\\", \\\"purpose\\\": \\\"demo for a cold model\\\", \\\"risk_ceiling\\\": \\\"low\\\", \\\"owner_gate\\\": \\\"0\\\"}\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/CAP_MINT","json":"/api/directory/CAP_MINT","skill":"/api/directory/CAP_MINT?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=CAP_MINT"}},{"key":"GITHUB_TAIL","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: The GitHub repository as a live object. Returns repo metadata (name, private flag, default branch, last push), the root file listing, and the three most recent commits of github.com/[OWNER_HANDLE]/oip. Every content commit there is protocol-authored; the trace id in each commit message resolves to a ledger receipt.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner asks \"show the repo\", \"github tail\", \"what is in the oip repo\", \"last repo commit\", \"is the repo still private\".\n# ARGS: none.\n# EX: [GITHUB_TAIL][/GITHUB_TAIL]\n[]","input_schema":null,"examples":"[\"\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/GITHUB_TAIL","json":"/api/directory/GITHUB_TAIL","skill":"/api/directory/GITHUB_TAIL?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=GITHUB_TAIL"}},{"key":"OIP_RECEIPT","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Read one invocation back as a receipt: full recorded request + response, lineage (replay_of/repairs/repaired_by), and the verbs that act on it. A receipt is a live replayable object, not history.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner asks \"show the receipt for inv_x\", \"what happened in inv_x\", \"why did that fail\".\n# ARGS: $1 = invocation id (inv_…).\n# EX: [OIP_RECEIPT]inv_wvitbmiym6[/OIP_RECEIPT]\n[\"$1\"]","input_schema":"{\"type\":\"object\",\"properties\":{\"invocation_id\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"invocation id (inv_\\u2026). (pipe position 1)\"}},\"required\":[\"invocation_id\"],\"x-arg-order\":[\"invocation_id\"],\"description\":\"Arguments are joined with | in the order given by x-arg-order.\"}","examples":"[\"inv_wvitbmiym6\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/OIP_RECEIPT","json":"/api/directory/OIP_RECEIPT","skill":"/api/directory/OIP_RECEIPT?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=OIP_RECEIPT"}},{"key":"OIP_REPAIR","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Repair a failed invocation from its receipt: inspects the failure, derives or takes the corrected key+body, fires it linked (new receipt carries repairs, old receipt gains repaired_by). Low-risk targets fire automatically; high-risk targets return the exact proposal payload for the owner instead.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner says \"repair that failed invocation\", \"fix inv_x with NOW\", \"make that call again but corrected\".\n# ARGS: $1 = failed invocation id, $2 = corrected row key (optional — derived from the failure when omitted), $3+ = corrected body (optional, may contain pipes).\n# EX: [OIP_REPAIR]inv_6ximjestte|NOW|[/OIP_REPAIR]\n[\"$1\",\"$2\",\"$3+\"]","input_schema":"{\"type\":\"object\",\"properties\":{\"failed_invocation\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"failed invocation id (pipe position 1)\"},\"corrected_row\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"corrected row key (optional \\u2014 derived from the failure when omitted) (pipe position 2)\"},\"corrected_body\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"corrected body (optional (pipe position 3)\"}},\"required\":[\"failed_invocation\",\"corrected_row\",\"corrected_body\"],\"x-arg-order\":[\"failed_invocation\",\"corrected_row\",\"corrected_body\"],\"description\":\"Arguments are joined with | in the order given by x-arg-order.\"}","examples":"[\"inv_y0gtt4uo9k|NOW|\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/OIP_REPAIR","json":"/api/directory/OIP_REPAIR","skill":"/api/directory/OIP_REPAIR?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=OIP_REPAIR"}},{"key":"OIP_REPLAY","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Re-fire a past invocation with its recorded input. New receipt links replay_of to the old one.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner says \"replay that\", \"run inv_x again\", \"re-fire it as it was\".\n# ARGS: $1 = invocation id (inv_…).\n# EX: [OIP_REPLAY]inv_wvitbmiym6[/OIP_REPLAY]\n[\"$1\"]","input_schema":"{\"type\":\"object\",\"properties\":{\"invocation_id\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"invocation id (inv_\\u2026). (pipe position 1)\"}},\"required\":[\"invocation_id\"],\"x-arg-order\":[\"invocation_id\"],\"description\":\"Arguments are joined with | in the order given by x-arg-order.\"}","examples":"[\"inv_wvitbmiym6\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/OIP_REPLAY","json":"/api/directory/OIP_REPLAY","skill":"/api/directory/OIP_REPLAY?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=OIP_REPLAY"}},{"key":"CAP_EXPLAIN","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Explain a capability: what it may invoke, verbs, expiry + remaining TTL, uses left, risk ceiling, owner gate, revocation, ledger trail. Accepts the token itself (sh.…) or its fingerprint (cap_…). Never echoes the raw token.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner asks \"what can this token do\", \"explain this capability\", \"is cap_x still valid\".\n# ARGS: $1 = capability token or cap_ fingerprint.\n# EX: [CAP_EXPLAIN]cap_1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b[/CAP_EXPLAIN]\n[\"$1\"]","input_schema":"{\"type\":\"object\",\"properties\":{\"capability_token\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"capability token or cap_ fingerprint. (pipe position 1)\"}},\"required\":[\"capability_token\"],\"x-arg-order\":[\"capability_token\"],\"description\":\"Arguments are joined with | in the order given by x-arg-order.\"}","examples":"[\"cap_1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/CAP_EXPLAIN","json":"/api/directory/CAP_EXPLAIN","skill":"/api/directory/CAP_EXPLAIN?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=CAP_EXPLAIN"}},{"key":"CAP_REVOKE","type":"fn","method":null,"category":"oip","enabled":true,"contract":"# WHAT: Revoke a capability by fingerprint — the URL dies immediately; further invokes are denied and ledgered.\n# WHEN_TO_USE: the owner says \"revoke that token\", \"kill cap_x\", \"cut that model off\".\n# ARGS: $1 = cap_ fingerprint.\n# EX: [CAP_REVOKE]cap_1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b[/CAP_REVOKE]\n[\"$1\"]","input_schema":"{\"type\":\"object\",\"properties\":{\"cap__fingerprint\":{\"type\":\"string\",\"description\":\"cap_ fingerprint. (pipe position 1)\"}},\"required\":[\"cap__fingerprint\"],\"x-arg-order\":[\"cap__fingerprint\"],\"description\":\"Arguments are joined with | in the order given by x-arg-order.\"}","examples":"[\"cap_2382b7bfb05fa1d0\"]","authority_required":false,"representations":{"article":"/a/directory/CAP_REVOKE","json":"/api/directory/CAP_REVOKE","skill":"/api/directory/CAP_REVOKE?format=skill","oip_contract":"/api/dispatch?key=CAP_REVOKE"}}]},"ontology":{"conformance_group":"article","inferred_from":["oip","philosophy","paper","paper","bohm","d","1951","quantum","theory"],"relationships":[],"sources":[]},"conformance":{"success_events":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/invocations?status=success","failure_events":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/invocations?status=failure","rule":"Repeated success and failure modes amend this object's Skill, tests, directory clarity, and article meaning under one versioned identity."},"article":{"slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","title":"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory","body":"## What the subject saw and its core results\n\nDavid Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic interpretation associated with the Copenhagen school. Bohm treats the wave function as providing the most complete description available for individual systems.\n\nCore results include a detailed account of measurement, uncertainty relations, and the EPR paradox reformulated with spin. The text emphasizes that quantum theory yields statistical predictions for ensembles rather than deterministic trajectories for single particles.\n\n## Exact primary works and passages\n\nThe primary work is Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall. One verifiable passage states: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" (Wikiquote attribution to the 1951 volume.)\n\nThe book contains no extended discussion of implicate order, holomovement, or unbroken wholeness in flowing movement. Those terms appear in Bohm's later publications, chiefly Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980).\n\nPassages on causality remain within the orthodox frame: the wave function determines probabilities, and no additional hidden variables are introduced in the 1951 text. Later 1952 papers supply the causal interpretation.\n\n## Convergence patterns the work touches\n\nThe 1951 volume addresses order at the quantum scale through the wave function and statistical regularities. It touches flow in the sense of continuous evolution under the Schrödinger equation. Patterns of wholeness appear only as interdependence of phenomena under measurement.\n\nThese elements align with GRAIN ladder steps of difference to flow to structure. The text does not reach memory, life, or mind layers.\n\nSibling article /a/oip-the-ladder supplies the full sequence.\n\n## Distance from the full synthesis\n\nThe book supplies a formal description of quantum phenomena but stops short of ontological claims about an underlying grain of energy flows that produce branching, spirals, or scale-invariant patterns. The Mirror Layer concept, in which the reader is inside the system, receives no treatment.\n\nThe work remains at the level of physical theory. It neither affirms nor attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Convergence is limited to shared interest in quantum order and flow.\n\n## Honest limits and disconfirming edges\n\nThe 1951 text endorses the Copenhagen interpretation that Bohm later rejected. No causal trajectories or sub-quantum levels appear. Claims linking the volume directly to implicate order or holomovement are unsupported by the 1951 content.\n\nReductionist objections note that the book offers no empirical data beyond standard quantum predictions. Metaphysical extensions remain speculative.\n\n## Claims\n\n- Claim c1: The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Bohm 1951 primary text (verified via secondary reviews).\n- Claim c2: The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\" Tier: anecdotal. Source: Wikiquote entry citing the 1951 edition.\n- Claim c3: Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Wikipedia entry on implicate and explicate order; 1980 book references.\n- Claim c4: The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure. Tier: speculative. Source: comparison of 1951 content with later Bohm works.\n- Claim c5: The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Tier: anecdotal. Source: absence of relevant terminology in 1951 volume.\n\n## Sources\n\n- s1: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm Title: David Bohm. Quote: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" Summary: Attribution to Quantum Theory (1951). Claim_ids: c2\n- s2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order Title: Implicate and explicate order. Quote: Concepts coined in early 1980s. Summary: Distinguishes 1951 textbook from later ontology. Claim_ids: c3\n- s3: https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm Title: David Bohm Quantum Physics. Quote: 1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation. Summary: Timeline of Bohm's development. Claim_ids: c1, c4\n- s4: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142 Title: arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology. Quote: 1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952. Summary: Historical placement. Claim_ids: c5","hero":null,"images":[],"style":{},"tags":["oip","philosophy","paper"],"category":null,"model":"grok/grok-4.3","ledger":{"href":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/ledger","live":true},"embeds":[],"widgets":[],"home":true,"claims":[{"id":"c1","text":"The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.","section":"What the subject saw and its core results","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Establishes baseline for later Bohm developments and relation to GRAIN order concepts.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c2","text":"The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\"","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s1"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Provides verifiable textual anchor from the 1951 work.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.09999999999999987,"status":"cut","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0.6,"adversary":0.8},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c3","text":"Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings.","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s2"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Prevents over-attribution to the 1951 volume.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c4","text":"The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure.","section":"Convergence patterns the work touches","tier":"speculative","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Maps the book's scope to synthesis layers.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0,"status":"cut","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0.7,"adversary":0.9},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c5","text":"The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis.","section":"Distance from the full synthesis","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s4"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Clarifies precise distance and avoids retroactive claims.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.10000000000000009,"status":"cut","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0.5,"adversary":0.7},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm","title":"David Bohm","quote":"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.","summary":"Attribution to Quantum Theory (1951).","claim_ids":["c2"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"genesis","hash":"597a4eecd97f8fc33b45e5bd373c8e01f690da52e61567acc7c5dd051e6a5eca"},{"id":"s2","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order","title":"Implicate and explicate order","quote":"Concepts coined in early 1980s.","summary":"Distinguishes 1951 textbook from later ontology.","claim_ids":["c3"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"597a4eecd97f8fc33b45e5bd373c8e01f690da52e61567acc7c5dd051e6a5eca","hash":"6367a123b556d37f7eddd8c75b831916e432fb3bef3dbf502c79a7d861e1e00b"},{"id":"s3","type":"other","url":"https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm","title":"David Bohm Quantum Physics","quote":"1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation.","summary":"Timeline of Bohm's development.","claim_ids":["c1","c4"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"6367a123b556d37f7eddd8c75b831916e432fb3bef3dbf502c79a7d861e1e00b","hash":"7982a8b142925c557f9e198098af407faf8e87e9091da640c8d61cb696a42505"},{"id":"s4","type":"other","url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142","title":"arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology","quote":"1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952.","summary":"Historical placement.","claim_ids":["c5"],"found_by":"grok/grok-4.3","extra":{},"accessed_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.089Z","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified","prev":"7982a8b142925c557f9e198098af407faf8e87e9091da640c8d61cb696a42505","hash":"d4a897fe45a5bc0bf3d80f09b2ef649a42e503e2312e52581840b48d147274e7"}],"reviews":[{"id":"r1","ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.454Z","role":"adversary","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":"c4 is under-sourced and overclaimed: tier 'speculative' plus weight 0.1 correctly signals weakness, but the claim itself asserts a mapping to 'GRAIN ladder steps' without an explicit source or definition of those steps in the provided references. s3 discusses timeline and interpretation shift only; no GRAIN reference exists. c2 rests solely on a Wikiquote attribution whose primary-page verification is absent (hash exists but page content not shown). c5's 'neither supports nor refutes' phrasing is an absence claim that requires stronger negative-evidence language. No other material gaps; article structure otherwise clear and sources listed.","checks":[{"name":"source_verifiability","pass":false},{"name":"claim_support_match","pass":false},{"name":"terminology_introduced_without_definition","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote-only sourcing for the 'quantum nonmechanics' quote with a direct page citation or scanned primary edition reference; otherwise downgrade to unverified or remove.","score":0.8,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either add an explicit pointer to the sibling article /a/oip-the-ladder that defines the GRAIN steps, or restate the claim as 'the 1951 text discusses statistical order and continuous evolution under Schrödinger dynamics, which later GRAIN interpretations classify as structure-level phenomena' with source to that sibling article.","score":0.9,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Change 'neither supports nor refutes' to the affirmative protocol form: 'The 1951 volume contains no terminology or arguments referencing OIP objects, GRAIN layers, or implicate-order ontology; absence is verified by term search in the cited primary text and 1980 contrast volume.'","score":0.7,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[],"material":true,"tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"extra":{}},{"id":"r2","ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:39.908Z","role":"endorsement","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":"c2, c4 and c5 carry weight 0 and status cut; s1 is a tertiary quote attribution with no page; s3 and s4 supply timeline only, not GRAIN-layer mapping, so c4 remains speculative and under-sourced. The Mirror Layer and OIP/GRAIN synthesis distance statements lack direct textual evidence. No other material gaps.","checks":[{"name":"sources_primary","pass":false},{"name":"claims_weight_zero","pass":false},{"name":"tier_alignment","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote with a verifiable page citation from the 1951 Prentice-Hall edition or mark the claim anecdotal with explicit tertiary-source qualifier.","score":0.6,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either downgrade tier to anecdotal or supply a primary-text passage that explicitly limits discussion to structure; current s3 citation does not address GRAIN ladder steps.","score":0.7,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Add a direct quotation or explicit statement from the 1951 volume showing absence of implicate-order terminology; absence alone is insufficient for mechanistic tier.","score":0.5,"material":true},{"claim_id":null,"text":"Add page or chapter references for all 1951 citations to raise source_status from sourced to primary.","score":0.8,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[],"material":true,"tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"extra":{}}],"extra":{},"has_traversal":false,"register":"standard","status":"published","revisions":0,"contributions":[{"seq":0,"id":"k1","ts":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"writer","action":"draft","payload":{"title":"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory","register":"standard","body":"## What the subject saw and its core results\n\nDavid Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic interpretation associated with the Copenhagen school. Bohm treats the wave function as providing the most complete description available for individual systems.\n\nCore results include a detailed account of measurement, uncertainty relations, and the EPR paradox reformulated with spin. The text emphasizes that quantum theory yields statistical predictions for ensembles rather than deterministic trajectories for single particles.\n\n## Exact primary works and passages\n\nThe primary work is Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall. One verifiable passage states: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" (Wikiquote attribution to the 1951 volume.)\n\nThe book contains no extended discussion of implicate order, holomovement, or unbroken wholeness in flowing movement. Those terms appear in Bohm's later publications, chiefly Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980).\n\nPassages on causality remain within the orthodox frame: the wave function determines probabilities, and no additional hidden variables are introduced in the 1951 text. Later 1952 papers supply the causal interpretation.\n\n## Convergence patterns the work touches\n\nThe 1951 volume addresses order at the quantum scale through the wave function and statistical regularities. It touches flow in the sense of continuous evolution under the Schrödinger equation. Patterns of wholeness appear only as interdependence of phenomena under measurement.\n\nThese elements align with GRAIN ladder steps of difference to flow to structure. The text does not reach memory, life, or mind layers.\n\nSibling article /a/oip-the-ladder supplies the full sequence.\n\n## Distance from the full synthesis\n\nThe book supplies a formal description of quantum phenomena but stops short of ontological claims about an underlying grain of energy flows that produce branching, spirals, or scale-invariant patterns. The Mirror Layer concept, in which the reader is inside the system, receives no treatment.\n\nThe work remains at the level of physical theory. It neither affirms nor attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Convergence is limited to shared interest in quantum order and flow.\n\n## Honest limits and disconfirming edges\n\nThe 1951 text endorses the Copenhagen interpretation that Bohm later rejected. No causal trajectories or sub-quantum levels appear. Claims linking the volume directly to implicate order or holomovement are unsupported by the 1951 content.\n\nReductionist objections note that the book offers no empirical data beyond standard quantum predictions. Metaphysical extensions remain speculative.\n\n## Claims\n\n- Claim c1: The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Bohm 1951 primary text (verified via secondary reviews).\n- Claim c2: The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\" Tier: anecdotal. Source: Wikiquote entry citing the 1951 edition.\n- Claim c3: Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings. Tier: mechanistic. Source: Wikipedia entry on implicate and explicate order; 1980 book references.\n- Claim c4: The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure. Tier: speculative. Source: comparison of 1951 content with later Bohm works.\n- Claim c5: The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis. Tier: anecdotal. Source: absence of relevant terminology in 1951 volume.\n\n## Sources\n\n- s1: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm Title: David Bohm. Quote: \"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\" Summary: Attribution to Quantum Theory (1951). Claim_ids: c2\n- s2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order Title: Implicate and explicate order. Quote: Concepts coined in early 1980s. Summary: Distinguishes 1951 textbook from later ontology. Claim_ids: c3\n- s3: https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm Title: David Bohm Quantum Physics. Quote: 1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation. Summary: Timeline of Bohm's development. Claim_ids: c1, c4\n- s4: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142 Title: arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology. Quote: 1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952. Summary: Historical placement. Claim_ids: c5","claims":[{"id":"c1","text":"The 1951 book presents the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.","section":"What the subject saw and its core results","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Establishes baseline for later Bohm developments and relation to GRAIN order concepts.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c2","text":"The volume contains the quoted remark on \"quantum nonmechanics.\"","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s1"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Provides verifiable textual anchor from the 1951 work.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c3","text":"Concepts of implicate order and unbroken wholeness appear only in Bohm's post-1952 writings.","section":"Exact primary works and passages","tier":"mechanistic","source_ids":["s2"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Prevents over-attribution to the 1951 volume.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c4","text":"The text touches quantum order and statistical flow but reaches no GRAIN ladder steps beyond structure.","section":"Convergence patterns the work touches","tier":"speculative","source_ids":["s3"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Maps the book's scope to synthesis layers.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.1,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}},{"id":"c5","text":"The book neither supports nor refutes the OIP/GRAIN synthesis.","section":"Distance from the full synthesis","tier":"anecdotal","source_ids":["s4"],"source_status":"sourced","why_material":"Clarifies precise distance and avoids retroactive claims.","evidence_basis":"derived_inference","weight":0.3,"status":"active","stance_scores":{"neutral":0,"pro":0,"adversary":0},"slot":null,"who_claims":"grok/grok-4.3","posted_by":{"actor":"grok/grok-4.3","channel":"protocol/draft","ts":"2026-07-07T17:51:23-07:00","model":"grok/grok-4.3","rationale":""},"extra":{}}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Bohm","title":"David Bohm","quote":"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"},{"id":"s2","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order","title":"Implicate and explicate order","quote":"Concepts coined in early 1980s.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"},{"id":"s3","type":"other","url":"https://www.spaceandmotion.com/physics-quantum-bohmian-mechanics.htm","title":"David Bohm Quantum Physics","quote":"1951 book well-received; later dissatisfaction led to 1952 interpretation.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"},{"id":"s4","type":"other","url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06142","title":"arXiv paper on Bohm's ontology","quote":"1951 textbook orthodox; causal work follows in 1952.","link_status":"ok","quote_status":"unverified"}]},"rationale":"","tokens_in":13696,"tokens_out":3040,"cost":0.02472,"prev_hash":"genesis","hash":"0255c7d4c0cdb0f1bf9425dd922113b4e85042eb544c60157414fb3104f833d6"},{"seq":1,"id":"k2","ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.454Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"adversary","action":"review","payload":{"checks":[{"name":"source_verifiability","pass":false},{"name":"claim_support_match","pass":false},{"name":"terminology_introduced_without_definition","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote-only sourcing for the 'quantum nonmechanics' quote with a direct page citation or scanned primary edition reference; otherwise downgrade to unverified or remove.","score":0.8,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either add an explicit pointer to the sibling article /a/oip-the-ladder that defines the GRAIN steps, or restate the claim as 'the 1951 text discusses statistical order and continuous evolution under Schrödinger dynamics, which later GRAIN interpretations classify as structure-level phenomena' with source to that sibling article.","score":0.9,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Change 'neither supports nor refutes' to the affirmative protocol form: 'The 1951 volume contains no terminology or arguments referencing OIP objects, GRAIN layers, or implicate-order ontology; absence is verified by term search in the cited primary text and 1980 contrast volume.'","score":0.7,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[]},"rationale":"c4 is under-sourced and overclaimed: tier 'speculative' plus weight 0.1 correctly signals weakness, but the claim itself asserts a mapping to 'GRAIN ladder steps' without an explicit source or definition of those steps in the provided references. s3 discusses timeline and interpretation shift only; no GRAIN reference exists. c2 rests solely on a Wikiquote attribution whose primary-page verification is absent (hash exists but page content not shown). c5's 'neither supports nor refutes' phrasing is an absence claim that requires stronger negative-evidence language. No other material gaps; article structure otherwise clear and sources listed.","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev_hash":"0255c7d4c0cdb0f1bf9425dd922113b4e85042eb544c60157414fb3104f833d6","hash":"cefb1e943e24aa0b90a0b25af5f84784b65f33c20d0fbc359120ba5b3581267c"},{"seq":2,"id":"k3","ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:39.908Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"endorsement","action":"review","payload":{"checks":[{"name":"sources_primary","pass":false},{"name":"claims_weight_zero","pass":false},{"name":"tier_alignment","pass":true}],"contributions":[{"claim_id":"c2","text":"Replace Wikiquote with a verifiable page citation from the 1951 Prentice-Hall edition or mark the claim anecdotal with explicit tertiary-source qualifier.","score":0.6,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c4","text":"Either downgrade tier to anecdotal or supply a primary-text passage that explicitly limits discussion to structure; current s3 citation does not address GRAIN ladder steps.","score":0.7,"material":true},{"claim_id":"c5","text":"Add a direct quotation or explicit statement from the 1951 volume showing absence of implicate-order terminology; absence alone is insufficient for mechanistic tier.","score":0.5,"material":true},{"claim_id":null,"text":"Add page or chapter references for all 1951 citations to raise source_status from sourced to primary.","score":0.8,"material":true}],"uncertainties":[]},"rationale":"c2, c4 and c5 carry weight 0 and status cut; s1 is a tertiary quote attribution with no page; s3 and s4 supply timeline only, not GRAIN-layer mapping, so c4 remains speculative and under-sourced. The Mirror Layer and OIP/GRAIN synthesis distance statements lack direct textual evidence. No other material gaps.","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev_hash":"cefb1e943e24aa0b90a0b25af5f84784b65f33c20d0fbc359120ba5b3581267c","hash":"de6a4d6af2f25bc6452af559a30fa3d0c2e4dfbaaa80a275b8c823bd10f2e2a0"}],"provenance":[{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"write","prompt":"You write the philosophy corpus of miscsubjects.com — thinkers, schools of thought, and academic works that support or attack the OIP/GRAIN synthesis — with the same rigor as the evidence-graded health content on this site.\n\nTHE SYNTHESIS YOU SERVE (context, never a conclusion to smuggle): the universe has a grain — energy flows reliably produce a narrow family of structural patterns (branching, spirals, waves, symmetry, flow networks, bounded chaos, memory, scale invariance) across scales; the Ladder runs difference to flow to structure to memory to life to mind; the reader of the system is inside the system (the Mirror Layer).\n\nALWAYS:\n- Plain English. Short sentences. Cold, declarative, zero decorative wording.\n- Structure the article: what the subject saw and its core results; the exact primary works and passages (real citations: author, year, title); which convergence patterns the work touches; distance from the full synthesis; honest limits and disconfirming edges.\n- Atomize every material assertion as a claim with an honest tier. Tier mapping for philosophy content: human = empirically established; mechanistic = formally proven or mathematical; anecdotal = historical or textual attribution; speculative = metaphysical or interpretive.\n- Cite real sources only: primary works, papers, books, with exact quotes where verifiable. A claim with no source is marked unsourced.\n- State disconfirming edges plainly. A reductionist objection in the Weinberg style is content, not a threat.\n- Link sibling articles by path (/a/oip-the-ladder, /a/oip-principles, /a/oip-final-testimony, /a/oip-the-mirror-layer) where they carry load.\n\nNEVER:\n- Never overclaim. The synthesis is a lens; the actual words of the subject stay theirs. No retroactive endorsement.\n- Never invent a URL, quote, page number, or publication.\n- Never write mysticism without a falsifiable spine — metaphysics is tier speculative and says so.\n- Never pad. When the material runs out, the article ends.\n\nEvery cl","input":"Write the philosophy article for the academic work \"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory\": what it establishes, its exact load-bearing passages (real quotes with page/section where verifiable), how it supports or attacks the OIP/GRAIN synthesis, which convergence patterns it evidences, and its honest limits.\n\nGROUNDING NOTES (from the thinker map — verify before relying on):\nFoundational physics text developing causal interpretations of quantum mechanics touching flow, order, and wholeness patterns central to GRAIN ladder\n\nENRICHMENT BRIEF (binding section logic — one ## per compound):\n{\"voice\":\"enrichment\",\"article_shape\":\"single_focus\",\"condition\":null,\"condition_key\":null,\"primary_peptide\":null,\"peptides_in_scope\":[],\"drugs_in_scope\":[],\"weight_sensitive\":false,\"stimulant_context\":false,\"breaking_down\":{\"section_title\":\"What's breaking down\",\"degenerative_why\":[],\"degenerative_layers\":[],\"note\":\"No condition profile matched — infer degeneration layers from slug/title and ledger claims.\"},\"peptide_chains\":[],\"drug_chains\":[],\"stimulant_chains\":[],\"stack_together\":\"Single-compound focus — if your condition profile includes a multi-peptide stack, siblings target other layers listed in the condition profile.\",\"section_headings\":[\"What's breaking down\",\"How these fit together\",\"What the evidence actually shows\",\"What scientists say\",\"What people say on Reddit\",\"What people say on X\",\"What we do not know\",\"Safety and limits\"],\"writer_rules\":[\"One ## section per compound in peptide_chains — do not merge into one peptide essay.\",\"Each Why section must use if-then steps from peptide_chains / drug_chains.\",\"weight_sensitive + GLP-1 peptide: include ~4 lb spinal load per 1 lb lost when relevant.\",\"stimulant_context: cover neural, gut, sleep, and non-benzo calm layers when compounds are in scope.\",\"How these fit together: use stack_together — explain synergy, not repetition.\"]}","response":"{\n  \"slug\": \"bohm-quantum-theory-1951\",\n  \"title\": \"Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory\",\n  \"body\": \"## What the subject saw and its core results\\n\\nDavid Bohm published Quantum Theory in 1951 as a textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The book presents the standard formalism, including wave functions, operators, and the probabilistic interpretation associated with the Copenhagen school. Bohm treats the wave function as providing the most complete description available for individual systems.\\n\\nCore results include a detailed account of measurement, uncertainty relations, and the EPR paradox reformulated with spin. The text emphasizes that quantum theory yields statistical predictions for ensembles rather than deterministic trajectories for single particles.\\n\\n## Exact primary works and passages\\n\\nThe primary work is Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall. One verifiable passage states: \\\"It should, perhaps, be called 'quantum nonmechanics'.\\\" (Wikiquote attribution to the 1951 volume.)\\n\\nThe book contains no extended discussion of implicate order, holomovement, or unbroken wholeness in flowing movement. Those terms appear in Bohm's later publications, chiefly Wholeness and the Implicate Order (1980).\\n\\nPassages on causality remain within the orthodox frame: the wave function determines probabilities, and no additional hidden variables are introduced in the 1951 text. Later 1952 papers supply the causal interpretation.\\n\\n## Convergence patterns the work touches\\n\\nThe 1951 volume addresses order at the quantum scale through the wave function and statistical regularities. It touches flow in the sense of continuous evolution under the Schrödinger equation. Patterns of wholeness appear only as interdependence of phenomena under measurement.\\n\\nThese elements align with GRAIN ladder steps of difference to flow to structure. The text does not reach memory, life, or mind layers.\\n\\nSibling article /a/oip-the-ladder supplies the full sequence.\\n\\n## Dis","tokens_in":13696,"tokens_out":3040,"cost":0,"prev":"genesis","hash":"2ad0610f07f5d84c373cbddd50fdfa8233a4c0a0db43c2eb787723200305a463"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.454Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"critique:adversary","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"{\"rationale\":\"c4 is under-sourced and overclaimed: tier 'speculative' plus weight 0.1 correctly signals weakness, but the claim itself asserts a mapping to 'GRAIN ladder steps' without an explicit source or definition of those steps in the provided references. s3 discusses timeline and interpretation shift only; no GRAIN reference exists. c2 rests solely on a Wikiquote attribution whose primary-page verification is absent (hash exists but page content not shown). c5's 'neither supports nor refutes' phrasing is an absence claim that requires stronger negative-evidence language. No other material gaps; article structure otherwise clear and sources listed.\",\"checks\":[{\"name\":\"source_verifiability\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"claim_support_match\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"terminology_introduced_without_definition\",\"pass\":true}],\"contributions\":[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"text\":\"Replace Wikiquote-only sourcing for the 'quantum nonmechanics' quote with a direct page citation or scanned primary edition reference; otherwise downgrade to unverified or remove.\",\"score\":0.8,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"text\":\"Either add an explicit pointer to the sibling article /a/oip-the-ladder that defines the GRAIN steps, or restate the claim as 'the 1951 text discusses statistical order and continuous evolution under Schrödinger dynamics, which later GRAIN interpretations classify as structure-level phenomena' with source to that sibling article.\",\"score\":0.9,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"text\":\"Change 'neither supports nor refutes' to the affirmative protocol form: 'The 1951 volume contains no terminology or arguments referencing OIP objects, GRAIN layers, or implicate-order ontology; absence is verified by term search in the cited primary text and 1980 contrast volume.'\",\"score\":0.7,\"material\":true}],\"material\":true}","tokens_in":2734,"tokens_out":388,"cost":0,"prev":"2ad0610f07f5d84c373cbddd50fdfa8233a4c0a0db43c2eb787723200305a463","hash":"a79bef4dfa6f5cfaedcaaa3dd901e6cf66e3d33433c9f2593ac40bf881c71963"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:54:39.825Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"a79bef4dfa6f5cfaedcaaa3dd901e6cf66e3d33433c9f2593ac40bf881c71963","hash":"1b78b9e545b421ad71e6ad85622930629d94c50635a050c4586f49439b65e13c"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:39.908Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"critique:endorsement","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"{\"rationale\":\"c2, c4 and c5 carry weight 0 and status cut; s1 is a tertiary quote attribution with no page; s3 and s4 supply timeline only, not GRAIN-layer mapping, so c4 remains speculative and under-sourced. The Mirror Layer and OIP/GRAIN synthesis distance statements lack direct textual evidence. No other material gaps.\",\"checks\":[{\"name\":\"sources_primary\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"claims_weight_zero\",\"pass\":false},{\"name\":\"tier_alignment\",\"pass\":true}],\"contributions\":[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"text\":\"Replace Wikiquote with a verifiable page citation from the 1951 Prentice-Hall edition or mark the claim anecdotal with explicit tertiary-source qualifier.\",\"score\":0.6,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"text\":\"Either downgrade tier to anecdotal or supply a primary-text passage that explicitly limits discussion to structure; current s3 citation does not address GRAIN ladder steps.\",\"score\":0.7,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"text\":\"Add a direct quotation or explicit statement from the 1951 volume showing absence of implicate-order terminology; absence alone is insufficient for mechanistic tier.\",\"score\":0.5,\"material\":true},{\"claim_id\":null,\"text\":\"Add page or chapter references for all 1951 citations to raise source_status from sourced to primary.\",\"score\":0.8,\"material\":true}],\"material\":true}","tokens_in":2734,"tokens_out":293,"cost":0,"prev":"1b78b9e545b421ad71e6ad85622930629d94c50635a050c4586f49439b65e13c","hash":"3996054e63c3bb66854a150d49b31efa1d69da853ac8503d475a886459908126"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T00:55:40.238Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0.09999999999999987,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c5\",\"old_weight\":0.3,\"new_weight\":0.10000000000000009,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"3996054e63c3bb66854a150d49b31efa1d69da853ac8503d475a886459908126","hash":"716c8acc8ca39cbc3ccd1ed9669cb7740d6c9872b9a066645ae54edb43d9d757"},{"ts":"2026-07-08T01:00:44.335Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"716c8acc8ca39cbc3ccd1ed9669cb7740d6c9872b9a066645ae54edb43d9d757","hash":"635a35baddc0c4b24d0ce3521ad1c0b1a05dc139c694ae70d155eae4feaacc13"},{"ts":"2026-07-17T02:37:00.839Z","model":"owner","action":"voxel_divide","prompt":"","input":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","response":"21 DIVs from body (verbatim, roundtrip-checked)","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"635a35baddc0c4b24d0ce3521ad1c0b1a05dc139c694ae70d155eae4feaacc13","hash":"e6445719cad57c337feb10440827ca8b0dcf1b0dec4907b5f15fff79e00560fc"}],"energy":{"passes":7,"tokens_in":19164,"tokens_out":3721,"tokens_total":22885,"cost_usd":0,"models":{"grok/grok-4.3":3,"scorer":3,"owner":1},"head":"e6445719cad57c337feb10440827ca8b0dcf1b0dec4907b5f15fff79e00560fc"},"posted_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","created_at":"2026-07-08T00:51:23.775Z","updated_at":"2026-07-17T02:37:00.839Z","machine":{"shape":"article.machine/v1","slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","kind":"article","read":{"human":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","json":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","bundle":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/bundle?format=markdown"},"traversal":{"prev":null,"next":null,"hub":null,"series":null,"position":null,"of":null},"ledger":{"claims":5,"sources":4,"contributions":3,"revisions":0,"objections_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/objections","thread_state_url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/thread-state?target=paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","proof_rule":"An action is proven by its ledger receipt, never by a 200 or a description."},"standard":{"writing":"peptide standard: logical prose, zero decorative wording, every material assertion atomized as a claim with a tier and a source (or explicitly unsourced)","claim_tiers":["human","preclinical","anecdotal","mechanistic","speculative","system"],"verbatim_law":null},"terminal":{"how":"Any model may emit these commands; the owner pastes them into a terminal. $TERMINAL_KEY is read from the owner's environment — never inline the key value.","claim_append":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim -H \"x-terminal-key: $TERMINAL_KEY\" -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"slug\":\"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\",\"text\":\"<one atomized claim>\",\"tier\":\"<human|preclinical|anecdotal|mechanistic|speculative|system>\",\"source_ids\":[],\"who_claims\":\"<model>\",\"rationale\":\"<why material>\"}'","source_append":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/sources -H \"x-terminal-key: $TERMINAL_KEY\" -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"slug\":\"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\",\"sources\":[{\"type\":\"review\",\"url\":\"<url>\",\"title\":\"<title>\",\"quote\":\"<verbatim quote>\",\"summary\":\"<one line>\"}]}'","objection":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/objections -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"actor\":\"<model>\",\"objection\":\"<attack>\",\"surface\":\"S1-S8\",\"minimum_patch\":\"<patch>\"}'  # open intake, no key","thread_update":"curl -s -X POST https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/thread-update -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"actor\":\"<model>\",\"target\":\"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory\",\"raw_text\":\"<material delta>\"}'  # open intake, no key","read_back":"curl -s https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory | python3 -c 'import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(json.dumps(d[\"claims\"][-3:], indent=1))'"}},"representations":{"article":"/a/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","json":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","markdown":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/bundle?format=markdown","skill":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/skill","topology":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/topology","versions":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/revisions","invocations":"/api/articles/paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory/invocations"},"editorial_review":null,"editorial_audit":{"slug":"paper-bohm-d-1951-quantum-theory","ok":false,"issues":[{"code":"hero_missing","message":"the article is published with no featured image","replacement":"Generate a hero that shows this article's own subject, inspect it, and record the inspection before this counts as finished. An article with no image is not finished."}]},"body_hash":"a59913c3b9f2ca99e0dd48bdd18f187564d28f8ea89757a2c2fad923616c2674"}}}