{"slug":"philosophy-protocol","verification":{"valid":true,"entries":1,"head":"3e30e37ce8c7a287e483eb467f786481fe3b88eebbd95f1d01bd4cddad81f2f7"},"count":1,"models":["grok/grok-4.3"],"yield":{"passes":1,"energy_spent_rows":0,"total_cost_usd":0.00878,"waste_cost_usd":0,"total_tokens":6564,"material_outputs":0,"usd_per_output":null,"models":[{"model":"grok/grok-4.3","passes":1,"cost_usd":0.00878,"tokens_total":6564,"outputs":0,"waste_passes":0,"usd_per_output":null}],"constraints":{"constitution":"/api/articles/constitution","collaborate_schema":"POST /api/protocol/collaborate","pricing_ppm":{"grok-4.3":[1.25,2.5],"grok/grok-4.3":[1.25,2.5],"grok-build-0.1":[1,2],"kimi/moonshot-v1-8k":[0.15,0.15],"gemini/gemini-2.5-flash":[0.075,0.3],"gemini/gemini-2.0-flash-lite":[0.075,0.3],"openai/gpt-4o":[2.5,10],"openai/gpt-4o-mini":[0.15,0.6],"system/reflex":[0,0],"ingest:deterministic":[0,0],"fill-slots":[0,0]}}},"contributions":[{"seq":0,"id":"k1","ts":"2026-07-03T16:23:27.786Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","role":"ask","action":"ask","payload":{"question":"How does the philosophy prosecute the build, and how does the build prosecute the philosophy?","answer":"The philosophy prosecutes the build by demanding receipts, ledger events, and measurable self-correction for any claim that an action worked, that tools are known, or that the system is self-correcting (p_recursive_law). The build prosecutes the philosophy by forcing every statement into evidentiary grammar: source id, claim id, falsifier, attack type, minimum patch, and ledger route; a sentence that cannot become a voxel is not yet operational (p_recursive_law, p_admission_invariant, p_attack_protocol). Core mappings include moral floor to publish/proof gate, capability-weighted obligation to scoped tokens, invariant installation to directory-row repair, proof artifact to OIP receipts, and maker-system collapse to the public build judging its own law under load (p_moral_floor, p_obligation, p_invariant_installation, p_proof_artifact, p_maker_system_collapse, b_receipts, b_capabilities, b_conformance). A philosophy claim is admitted only with source id, hash, claim id, edge, falsifier, and patch path; a build claim requires live route, invocation shape, ledgered proof, and repair path; conflict becomes a work order as claim delta or self-test question. Open gaps remain in full task-adjusted logical density pricing and systematic philosophy-specific self-test questions tied to this corpus (g_logical_density_unpriced, g_philosophy_selftest_missing).","cited_claim_ids":["p_recursive_law","p_admission_invariant","p_attack_protocol","p_moral_floor","p_obligation","p_invariant_installation","p_proof_artifact","p_maker_system_collapse","b_receipts","b_capabilities","b_conformance","g_logical_density_unpriced","g_philosophy_selftest_missing"],"cited_source_ids":["src_convergence_thesis","src_total_structure_v3","src_unified_philosophy","src_highest_calling","src_oip_doc"],"needs_user_info":[],"gaps":["full task-adjusted logical density pricing","systematic philosophy-specific self-test questions","owner-style prosecution tied to corpus"],"resolved_slugs":["philosophy-protocol"],"graph":false},"rationale":"Q: How does the philosophy prosecute the build, and how does the build prosecute the philosophy?","tokens_in":6104,"tokens_out":460,"cost":0.00878,"prev_hash":"genesis","hash":"3e30e37ce8c7a287e483eb467f786481fe3b88eebbd95f1d01bd4cddad81f2f7"}]}