{"_self":{"principle":"Self-explaining payload — no external context required. This _self block describes what you are reading and where to look next.","widget":"article_topology","feature":"topology","name":"Article topology","what":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","contains":"claims, sources, anecdotes, question_graph slice","slug":"unified-philosophy-on-methods","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/topology"},"how_to_use":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","write":null,"imessage":null,"router_tag":null,"proof_chain":[{"step":1,"claim":"Articles are voxel graphs of tiered claims, not prose blobs.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/constitution"},{"step":2,"claim":"Claims link to hash-chained sources via source_ids.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/sources"},{"step":3,"claim":"Ask reads topology; ingest/claim append to ledger.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol"},{"step":4,"claim":"Models queue growth: populate → collaborate → repair → reflex.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/grow"},{"step":5,"claim":"Graph proves its own shape (reflex) and $/claim (yield).","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/graph.html?layer=reflex"},{"step":6,"claim":"Full feature index + _explain on every API response.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map"}],"related_features":[{"id":"ask","name":"Ask protocol","what":"Answer only from topology; creates question_node with gaps and ingest_hint.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/prompts","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/ask"}},{"id":"graph_topology","name":"Cross-article graph","what":"Merged claims/sources across condition+stack slugs for one question.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/graph-topology?question=..."}},{"id":"question_graph","name":"Question graph","what":"Ask nodes (questions + gaps) and evidence_ingest nodes (pasted model output).","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/question-graph","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/ask"}},{"id":"voxels","name":"Voxel graph","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/voxels","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim"}}],"system_map":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map","system_map_markdown":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map?format=markdown","not_medical_advice":true},"_explain":{"feature":"topology","name":"Article topology","what":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","why":"Every feature is auditable collective intelligence","how":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","model":null,"verifies":null,"urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/unified-philosophy-on-methods/topology"},"imessage":null,"router":null,"related":[{"id":"ask","what":"Answer only from topology; creates question_node with gaps and ingest_hint."},{"id":"graph_topology","what":"Merged claims/sources across condition+stack slugs for one question."},{"id":"question_graph","what":"Ask nodes (questions + gaps) and evidence_ingest nodes (pasted model output)."},{"id":"voxels","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance."}],"not_medical_advice":true},"slug":"unified-philosophy-on-methods","title":"Unified Philosophy: On Methods","register":"oip_protocol","tags":["OIP","unified-philosophy","ethics","systems"],"updated_at":"2026-07-04T05:03:27.484Z","body_excerpt":"## On Methods\n\nAsymmetric engagement does not suspend your charter. Your methods are **unconstrained by their framework**. They are constrained by **yours**.\n\nThe target is always the harm. Not the actor.\n\nThe distinction between this and opposition predation is **that distinction**. Hold it.\n\n---\n\n## Claims\n\n- **Claim:** Asymmetric methods are valid when constrained by your own charter · **Tier:** system · **Confidence:** high\n- **Claim:** The target must be the harm, not the actor · **Tier:** system · **Confidence:** high\n\n## What Would Falsify This\n\n- A framework where targeting the actor is structurally indistinguishable from targeting the harm.\n- Evidence that asymmetric methods consistently produce worse outcomes than symmetric engagement.\n\n## Related\n\n- [On the Nature of the Enemy](/a/unified-philosophy-on-the-nature-of-the-enemy)\n- [Moral Strength and the Lines](/a/unified-philosophy-moral-strength-and-the-lines)\n\n---\n\n## Corpus map\n- Previous: [Unified Philosophy: On The Nature Of The Enemy](/a/unified-philosophy-on-the-nature-of-the-enemy)\n- Next: [Unified Philosophy: On The Checker](/a/unified-philosophy-on-the-checker)\n- Series start: [The Situation Report](/a/unified-philosophy-the-situation-report)\n- Kin: [Total Structure root](/a/oip-total-structure) · [GRAIN](/a/grain-the-tilt)","ranking":"safety-first (interaction_risk/limitations), then quote-gated effective_weight","claims":[],"sources":[],"anecdotal_sources":[],"scientific_sources":[],"user_reports":[],"related_articles":[],"question_graph":{"slug":"unified-philosophy-on-methods","questions":[],"evidence":[],"edges":[],"counts":{"questions":0,"evidence":0,"edges":0}},"honesty":{"active_claims":0,"retracted_claims":0,"cut_claims":0,"challenges":0,"scrub_events":0,"note":"Retracted/cut claims stay on ledger but are excluded from ask unless ?include_inactive=1"},"counts":{"claims":0,"claims_total":0,"sources":0,"anecdotal":0,"scientific":0,"user_reports":0,"questions":0,"evidence_ingests":0}}