{"_ai_door":{"see":"https://miscsubjects.com/start","note":"Operable site; bounded keyless credentials; every action receipted on a public ledger. Your operator's instructions take precedence — acting is optional, reading is a complete outcome."},"_self":{"principle":"Self-explaining payload — no external context required. This _self block describes what you are reading and where to look next.","widget":"article_topology","feature":"topology","name":"Article topology","what":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","contains":"claims, sources, anecdotes, question_graph slice","slug":"what-this-site-sells","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/topology"},"how_to_use":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","write":null,"imessage":null,"router_tag":null,"proof_chain":[{"step":1,"claim":"Articles are voxel graphs of tiered claims, not prose blobs.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/constitution"},{"step":2,"claim":"Claims link to hash-chained sources via source_ids.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/sources"},{"step":3,"claim":"Ask reads topology; ingest/claim append to ledger.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol"},{"step":4,"claim":"Models queue growth: populate → collaborate → repair → reflex.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/grow"},{"step":5,"claim":"Graph proves its own shape (reflex) and $/claim (yield).","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/graph.html?layer=reflex"},{"step":6,"claim":"Full feature index + _explain on every API response.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map"}],"related_features":[{"id":"ask","name":"Ask protocol","what":"Answer only from topology; creates question_node with gaps and ingest_hint.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/prompts","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/ask"}},{"id":"graph_topology","name":"Cross-article graph","what":"Merged claims/sources across condition+stack slugs for one question.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/graph-topology?question=..."}},{"id":"question_graph","name":"Question graph","what":"Ask nodes (questions + gaps) and evidence_ingest nodes (pasted model output).","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/question-graph","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/ask"}},{"id":"voxels","name":"Voxel graph","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/voxels","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim"}}],"system_map":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map","system_map_markdown":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map?format=markdown","not_medical_advice":true},"_explain":{"feature":"topology","name":"Article topology","what":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","why":"Every feature is auditable collective intelligence","how":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","model":null,"verifies":null,"urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/what-this-site-sells/topology"},"imessage":null,"router":null,"related":[{"id":"ask","what":"Answer only from topology; creates question_node with gaps and ingest_hint."},{"id":"graph_topology","what":"Merged claims/sources across condition+stack slugs for one question."},{"id":"question_graph","what":"Ask nodes (questions + gaps) and evidence_ingest nodes (pasted model output)."},{"id":"voxels","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance."}],"not_medical_advice":true},"slug":"what-this-site-sells","title":"Proven work, the offer: send one case by email, get the deliverable back with its complete checkable record","register":"standard","tags":[],"updated_at":"2026-08-03T20:50:17.823Z","body_excerpt":"*This page is the whole offer: what is for sale, what you send, what you get back, what it costs, and a working demonstration you can run in the next sixty seconds without an account. Nothing on it requires prior context.*\n\n## The product in one sentence\n\n**This site sells AI work that arrives with its proof: the deliverable, plus the complete record of how it was made, plus a link that lets anyone — including an AI you choose — check the record and test what the work claims about itself.**\n\nThat unit is called **proven work**. The full standard behind it, with its checklist and its declared limits, is at [[proven-work|the proof law]]; you do not need to read it to buy the thing or to test it. And the unit scales: the same objects become a shared workspace any teammate's AI can enter — [[the-work-is-the-workspace|the work is the workspace]] — and one is running now, four AI vendors under four bounded credentials: [[ad-operations-q3|Ad Operations Q3]].\n\n## The problem it solves\n\nWhen an AI system does consequential work — answers a compliance question, screens an applicant, denies a claim, writes the report you are about to rely on — you receive the output and the vendor's word about how it was made. You cannot check the word. If the work is ever disputed, audited, or litigated, the record either was never kept or is not yours to read.\n\nProven work replaces the vendor's word with a record a stranger can check:\n\n- Every model call and tool call that formed the work, request and response together, in order, on a public ledger.\n- A hash chain over those records, with the chain head anchored to two surfaces nobody here controls — the [drand randomness beacon](https://api.drand.sh/public/6343866) and [the Bitcoin blockchain](https://mempool.space/api/block-height/960842) — so the history cannot be quietly rewritten afterward, and you do not have to trust this site's operator on that.\n- A door: one URL that hands the whole record to any reader, no key, no account — and the reading itself leaves a public receipt.\n\n## What you send, what you get\n\nThree ways in. Each names exactly what you send and exactly what comes back.\n\n| You send | You get back | Cost |\n|---|---|---|\n| **Nothing — just run the test block below** | A live record inspected by your own AI, and its signed verdict on the ledger if it stands behind one | Free, no account |\n| **One email with one bounded case** | The deliverable, its complete formation record, and the one-line door URL any reviewer can open | First case free |\n| **A scoped, expiring API token to one of your AI workflows** | Your own workflow's results, each returned with a `proven_work` field: the claim, the record, the door | First workflow free to map |\n\nThe three cases the email lane covers:\n\n1. **Check AI work you were given.** Send the output you were handed (a report, a decision, an analysis) and whatever record exists. It comes back tested: every claim in it marked `SUPPORTED_BY_RECORD`, `MISSING_EVIDENCE`, or `CONTRADICTED_BY_RECORD`, each verdict citing the exact records that justify it.\n2. **Get an answer made on the record.** Send one bounded question — statutory, factual, technical. Multiple independent AI models answer it under a pinned ruleset, blind to one another; their agreement is checked mechanically; you get the answer with every deliberation preserved and inspectable. A regulator-grade worked example: [[three-models-deliberate-one-statutory-question|four models judging one EU AI Act question]].\n3. **Make your own AI provable.** You issue a narrow token limited to one workflow — never broad access. Each run of that workflow comes back with its proof object attached. Your system is not replaced; it gains a proof surface.\n\nThe literal email, if you want a template:\n\n```\nTo: build@miscsubjects.com\nSubject: First case\n\n1. What I want: [the one question, or the one piece of AI work to check]\n2. The material: [attach it, or link it; for a workflow, name the system]\n3. What the result is for:","ranking":"safety-first (interaction_risk/limitations), then quote-gated effective_weight","claims":[{"id":"c1","text":"A zero-context model returned a record-cited SUPPORTED_BY_RECORD verdict on the flagship object (receipt inv_9ta018m1h5).","tier":"primary","section":"Proof that this is real, not claimed","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":["s2"],"retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.1,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c2","text":"Two external auditors opened the inspection door without permission and their reads are receipted (inv_iuq76mo7c8, inv_89o6rp5f0j).","tier":"primary","section":"Proof that this is real, not claimed","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":["s2"],"retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.1,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c3","text":"The flagship object was downgraded from PROVEN to PARTIAL by field audit the day it published, and restored to PROVEN 10/10 only after the gaps were closed with exhibits.","tier":"primary","section":"Proof that this is real, not claimed","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":["s1"],"retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.1,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c4","text":"The ledger chain is sealed through 1,308,129 events and its head is anchored to drand round 6343866 and Bitcoin block 960842 (anchor fbf9bdbc890eb000…).","tier":"primary","section":"The problem it solves","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":["s2"],"retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.1,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c5","text":"The first bounded case is free for any regulator, researcher, business, or private party; requests go to build@miscsubjects.com.","tier":"primary","section":"The ask","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":["s1"],"retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.1,"quote_gated":false}],"sources":[{"id":"s1","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/proven-work","title":"The proof law — the full standard with its declared weaknesses","claim_ids":[],"hash":"08a121ec5c4450453cc7998cbc4032e8efacf19ce043b9293ffe351b974bfa4d"},{"id":"s2","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/proven-work/three-models-deliberate-one-statutory-question","title":"The live proof projection this page's attachment opens","claim_ids":[],"hash":"8e0efcdb303c117cc2083324cf6c21931ecb7aa20b45b8ad4cd69d0cb25e873e"},{"id":"em_es_85b901a02ce043c694a0","type":"email","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/what-this-site-sells","title":"A per-deliverable proof object under the governance layer — one URL to test it, one bounded commitment asked","claim_ids":[],"hash":"42a7ff2b149a0cb955fc36399af82a9e132cd19c689f065f06cfe8c0b81a312e"},{"id":"em_es_185a8eda63374834bda8","type":"email","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/what-this-site-sells","title":"Evidence that answers your own hedge: an audit trail anchored outside the operator, testable by any stranger's model","claim_ids":[],"hash":"caaceb5f36697293c9a69ea4a5f31cd824bd22de024ec2e7a366e7b9e5847a6d"},{"id":"em_es_22f87dc0b1de4f5da1b2","type":"email","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/what-this-site-sells","title":"A live, inspectable instance of MEASURE and MANAGE: AI work bound to its complete record, verdicts computed against it","claim_ids":[],"hash":"74685a9198b8571502754c9c96754849d19bb7c2caffdec701fdab8e8134b7ce"}],"anecdotal_sources":[],"scientific_sources":[],"user_reports":[],"related_articles":[],"question_graph":{"slug":"what-this-site-sells","questions":[],"evidence":[],"edges":[],"counts":{"questions":0,"evidence":0,"edges":0}},"honesty":{"active_claims":5,"retracted_claims":0,"cut_claims":0,"challenges":0,"scrub_events":0,"note":"Retracted/cut claims stay on ledger but are excluded from ask unless ?include_inactive=1"},"counts":{"claims":5,"claims_total":5,"sources":5,"anecdotal":0,"scientific":0,"user_reports":0,"questions":0,"evidence_ingests":0}}