Collection

Canon

Provenance, traces, attestations — every system proves custody of the answer; none opens the record of the work

Start with the thing everyone keeps inflating. Ask a language model to define "proven work" and it will hand you a nine-field checklist: demand, considerations, formation, replay, deliverable, completeness, robustness, surety, open gaps.

Canon

Deepfakes under the EU AI Act: the rule that applies now

The statute is settled; how it will be enforced is not. Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 is law and its dates are fixed, and that is what this page describes. What is not fixed is the layer that decides what compliance actually

Canon

EU AI Act: The Complete Compliance Guide

This page is a complete map of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act — as it stands after the July 2026 amendments: what the law is, who it binds, every risk tier, every operative deadline, the

Canon

Is this AI system high-risk? The Article 6 decision tree

Which text this page reads, and when. Everything below is the Artificial Intelligence Act as published in the Official Journal — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 — read on 6 August 2026. Article 6 sets the high-risk test; Annex

Canon

8,584 organisations discovered, 680 with verified addresses, 11 drafts, 5 emails sent: the outreach pipeline and every gate in it

This build has a working lead-discovery and outreach system. Until this page existed, none of it was documented anywhere a reader outside the build could see: the scrapers, the enrichment crawler, the qualification gates, the drafting

Canon

Proven work: the base unit — a claim, a record, and a door

This is the canonical definition of the base unit this whole system is built around: proven work — one page, no siblings. It settles whether the reframe is correct, reduces the object to its smallest true structure, states the standard as

Canon

The vendor graded its own work: why a self-certified AI verdict proves less

Every AI proof product asks the buyer to trust one number: the verdict. This page is about who is allowed to compute it. When the verdict about a piece of AI work is signed or computed by the same party that produced — or sold — the work,

Canon

Proven work: the base unit — a claim, a record, and a door

This page defines the base unit this whole system is built around: proven work. It settles whether the reframe is correct, reduces the object to its smallest true structure, states the standard as a checklist — what qualifies, what does

Canon

Proven Work 001: can the first object prove how it was made?

The first Proven Work object is an audit of the page that proposed Proven Work as the site’s base unit. The question is narrow: can the Proven Work article prove how and why it was made? The answer is PARTIAL. The article exists. Its

Canon

The research report you can cross-examine: conclusions bound to receipts, gaps named on the page

A hedge fund's director of research, a private-equity diligence principal, or a corporate strategy lead who buys a research report today receives two things: a PDF and a reputation. The PDF carries the conclusions. The reputation — the

Canon

A permanent operating system that lets successive AI models inherit one person’s work

Every capability, every article, every receipt — the primitive, the equation, the measured configuration-to-error-rate table, and the loop executable in one call: action class to policy to measured configuration to execution to a gate that loads the gateway records itself. Two unanimous conforming runs were still refused, ten forgeries failed closed, and no bound assembly has ever authorised anything.

Canon

This site now derives its own work queue — and exports itself as an Obsidian vault

On August 2, 2026, this system gained three connected capabilities in one session: article bodies now carry Obsidian-style that render as ordinary links on the site and resolve natively in Obsidian; the entire corpus exports as a working

Canon

Four AI models judged one EU AI Act disclosure — sealed record-bound APPROVE, with the discarded finding printed

Four frontier AI systems — from OpenAI, Anthropic, Z.ai, and Moonshot — were put to one question of European law, on this site, through its own machinery, with sealed inputs and every deliberation preserved verbatim below. This specimen is

Canon

Seven criteria for deciding whether published content is genuinely AI-native

"AI-native content" currently means either content written by AI or content with a text file telling AI where the pages are. Neither survives contact with what a model actually needs. This is the canonical record of the term: a definition,

Canon

Proven work, the offer: send one case by email, get the deliverable back with its complete checkable record

This page is the whole offer: what is for sale, what you send, what you get back, what it costs, and a working demonstration you can run in the next sixty seconds without an account. Nothing on it requires prior context. This site sells AI

the whole object this page is drawn from, as JSON · Open JSON

{
  "schema": "page/1",
  "id": "type:canon",
  "layout": "collection",
  "kind": "Collection",
  "status": "published",
  "title": "Canon",
  "summary": "",
  "query": {
    "kind": "canon"
  },
  "version": "e9c349be0c36b241650dcbc14af8ee97df1a83528ddc1f229e3dfc702730829e"
}