Convergence Encyclopedia: C21 — Emergence / "More Is Different"
F1 — Tier. T1 (phenomenon — emergent behavior is well-documented); T3 (interpretation — whether emergence is ontological or merely epistemological is philosophical). Load-bearing at T1; T3 mapping only.
F2 — Sources.
- Anderson, P.W. (1972). “More is different.” Science, 177(4047), 393–396. Note: v1 confused this with C04 (symmetry-breaking). Anderson 1972 is the emergence paper; Anderson 1963 (C04) is the symmetry-breaking paper.
- Laughlin, R.B. & Pines, D. (2000). “The theory of everything.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(1), 28–31.
- Laughlin, R.B. (2005). A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down. Basic Books.
- Holland, J.H. (1998). Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Addison-Wesley.
- Corning, P.A. (2002). “The re-emergence of ‘emergence’: A venerable concept in search of a theory.” Complexity, 7(6), 18–30.
F3 — Domains. Condensed matter (superconductivity, fractional quantum Hall effect), biology (consciousness from neurons), chemistry (molecular properties from atomic physics), social systems (collective behavior from individual actions).
F4 — Scale. Atom (~10⁻¹⁰ m) → brain (~10⁻¹ m); electron (~10⁻¹⁵ m) → superconducting condensate (~10⁰ m).
F5 — Falsifier. Derivation of every higher-level regularity from micro-laws — a complete reduction of, e.g., superconductivity to single-electron quantum mechanics without introducing new concepts (Cooper pairs, collective modes). If reduction succeeds across all domains, emergence as a substantive claim fails.
F6 — Rival (strongest form). Emergence is a failure of current theory, not a feature of reality. “More is different” only because we lack the computational and conceptual tools to derive higher-level behavior from lower-level laws. Given infinite computational power and perfect knowledge of initial conditions, all higher-level regularities would be derivable. Emergence is epistemological (about us), not ontological (about the world). (Weinberg 1987 Dreams of a Final Theory; reductionist position. See also Bedau 1997 Weak Emergence for intermediate position.)
F7 — Independence. HIGH. Anderson (condensed matter physics, Bell Labs/Princeton, 1972), Laughlin (Nobel 1998, Stanford), Holland (computer science/complexity, Michigan/Santa Fe), Corning (systems biology, Stanford) — independent research programs. Anderson’s paper was a manifesto; the empirical phenomena (superconductivity, etc.) were established independently.
F8 — Pattern type. Structural.
F9 — Maps. A3 (pattern-dynamics), A9 (mathematical foundations).
---
Corpus map
- Previous: Convergence Encyclopedia: C20
- Next: Convergence Encyclopedia: C22
- Encyclopedia start: The Schema
- Same node, other planes: Catalogue node C21 · Catalogue hub
- Edges touching C21: convergence edge 7 · disconfirming edge 3
- Kin corpora: Total Structure · Signature of the Grain
Ask this article · 2 suggested prompts
Text the build (+14245134626) or WhatsApp — slug|question creates a question node. Paste evidence with ingest slug|q:NODE_ID|your paste.